Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26661516›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

Improving cardiomyocyte model fidelity and utility via dynamic electrophysiology protocols and optimization algorithms.

Trine Krogh-Madsen, Eric A Sobie, David J Christini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The electrophysiology of ventricular cell pairs.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Mathematical Model of the Human Cardiac NaThe Journal of membrane biology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Reproducible model development in the cardiac electrophysiology Web Lab.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2018
    Article
  20. The CaeLife · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trine Krogh-MadsenGreenberg Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Eric A SobiePharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
David J ChristiniGreenberg Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

System Biology Center in New YorkP50GM071558 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI IYENGAR, SRINIVAS RAVI V · 2007 to 2017
$22.8M
Real-time control system for biological experimentsR01EB016407 · NIBIB · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHRISTINI, DAVID J. · 2013 to 2016
$2.7M
Computational methods for mechanistic understanding of inter-sample variabilityR21HL122564 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SCHANIEL, CHRISTOPH, SOBIE, ERIC A · 2014 to 2015
$463k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL122564NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016407NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models of cardiac electrophysiology are instrumental in determining mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias. However, the foundation of a realistic multiscale heart model is only as strong as the underlying cell model. While there have been myriad advances in the improvement of cellular-level models, the identification of model parameters, such as ion channel conductances and rate constants, remains a challenging problem. The primary limitations to this process include: (1) such parameters are usually estimated from data recorded using standard electrophysiology voltage-clamp protocols that have not been developed with model building in mind, and (2) model parameters are typically tuned manually to subjectively match a desired output. Over the last decade, methods aimed at overcoming these disadvantages have emerged. These approaches include the use of optimization or fitting tools for parameter estimation and incorporating more extensive data for output matching. Here, we review recent advances in parameter estimation for cardiomyocyte models, focusing on the use of more complex electrophysiology protocols and global search heuristics. We also discuss future applications of such parameter identification, including development of cell-specific and patient-specific mathematical models to investigate arrhythmia mechanisms and predict therapy strategies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansMyocytes, CardiacPatient-Specific Modeling

Identifiers

PMID26661516
PMCPMC4850194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.