ReviewClinical journal of gastroenterology2015
Endoscopic features of submucosal deeply invasive colorectal cancer with NBI characteristics : S Saito et al. Endoscopic images of early colorectal cancer.
Review in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Estimation of invasion depth of early colorectal cancer using EUS and NBI-ME: a meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2019Pooled it
- Does Local Excision Without Salvage Surgery Affect the Prognostic Outcome of Patients With Malignant Colorectal Polyp? A Long-Term Survival Analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Early Rectal Cancer and Local Excision: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Dexmedetomidine is safe and effective for reducing intraprocedural pain in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.DEN open · 2023Article
- Longly-attached cap can contribute to en bloc underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of 20-30 mm colorectal intramucosal lesions.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Is barium enema examination negligible for the management of colorectal cancer? Comparison with conventional colonoscopy and magnifying colonoscopy.Japanese journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Preoperative endoscopic predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumors undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Prediction of colorectal tumor grade and invasion depth through narrow-band imaging scoring.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we discuss the features of conventional endoscopy, magnified endoscopy involving image enhanced endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) using illustrations for submucosal deeply invasive colorectal cancer (SM-Ca). First, the typical features of SM-Ca were observed, including fold convergence, stiffness, depression (ulceration) and elevated lesions in depressed areas. Magnified endoscopic findings using NBI showed dilated, irregularly shaped micro-capillary vessels. In addition, VI and VN pits were clearly visible using crystal violet staining. In contrast, using EUS, at the third layer we found a layer that was thin compared to the surrounding normal mucosa, which suggested the existence of SM-Ca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26661443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.