Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26661413›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2016

Adaptations in a Community-Based Family Intervention: Replication of Two Coding Schemes.

Brittany Rhoades Cooper, Gitanjali Shrestha, Leah Hyman, Laura Hill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Modifications of a Parenting Program in the Context of Scaling-Up and Scaling-Out: Documenting Furaha Teens in Tanzania Using FRAME.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Beyond effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Program (10-14): a scoping RE-AIM-based review.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany Rhoades CooperDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. brittany.cooper@wsu.edu.
Gitanjali ShresthaDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Leah HymanDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Laura HillDepartment of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.

Funding

Development of Econometric Models for Improved Estimation of Prevention Program BR21DA025139 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HILL, LAURA GRINER, ROSENMAN, ROBERT EDWARD · 2009 to 2010
$394k
Measuring and Tracking Statewde Model Program FidelityR21DA019758 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE DEPART SOC/HLTH SRVS · PI BECKER, LINDA GAIL · 2005 to 2006
$302k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA025139NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA025139-01ALNIDA NIH HHS R21 DA19758-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although program adaptation is a reality in community-based implementations of evidence-based programs, much of the discussion about adaptation remains theoretical. The primary aim of this study was to replicate two coding systems to examine adaptations in large-scale, community-based disseminations of the Strengthening Families Program for Parents and Youth 10-14, a family-based substance use prevention program. Our second aim was to explore intersections between various dimensions of facilitator-reported adaptations from these two coding systems. Our results indicate that only a few types of adaptations and a few reasons accounted for a majority (over 70 %) of all reported adaptations. We also found that most adaptations were logistical, reactive, and not aligned with program's goals. In many ways, our findings replicate those of the original studies, suggesting the two coding systems are robust even when applied to self-reported data collected from community-based implementations. Our findings on the associations between adaptation dimensions can inform future studies assessing the relationship between adaptations and program outcomes. Studies of local adaptations, like the present one, should help researchers, program developers, and policymakers better understand the issues faced by implementers and guide efforts related to program development, transferability, and sustainability.

Indexed as

Clinical CodingCommunity Health ServicesFamily TherapyPrimary PreventionAdolescentChildHumansProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationReproducibility of ResultsAdaptationsCommunity-based family preventionFidelityImplementation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.