Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26661333›Full record

SynthesisDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2016

Measurement properties of multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures in neurodisability: a systematic review of evaluation studies.

Astrid Janssens, Morwenna Rogers, Rebecca Gumm, Crispin Jenkinson, Alan Tennant, Stuart Logan, Christopher Morris

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patterns, trends and methodological associations in the measurement and valuation of childhood health utilities.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Astrid JanssensPenCRU and PenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Morwenna RogersPenCRU and PenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rebecca GummRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Crispin JenkinsonNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alan TennantDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Stuart LoganPenCRU and PenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Christopher MorrisPenCRU and PenCLAHRC, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/2002/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify and appraise the quality of studies that primarily assessed the measurement properties of English language versions of multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) when evaluated with children with neurodisability, and to summarize this evidence.

methodMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database were searched. The methodological quality of the papers was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. Evidence of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, proxy reliability, responsiveness, and precision was extracted and judged against standardized reference criteria.

resultsWe identified 48 studies of mostly fair to good methodological quality: 37 papers for seven generic PROMs (CHIP, CHQ, CQoL, KIDSCREEN, PedsQL, SLSS, and YQOL), seven papers for two chronic-generic PROMs (DISABKIDS and Neuro-QOL), and four papers for three preference-based measures (HUI, EQ-5D-Y, and CHSCS-PS).

interpretationOn the basis of this appraisal, the DISABKIDS appears to have more supportive evidence in samples of children with neurodisability. The overall lack of evidence for responsiveness and measurement error is a concern when using these instruments to measure change, or to interpret the findings of studies in which these PROMs have been used to assess change.

Indexed as

Neurodevelopmental DisordersPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesHumansPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID26661333
PMCPMC5031226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.