Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26660654›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology2016

(13)C-Breath testing in animals: theory, applications, and future directions.

Marshall D McCue, Kenneth C Welch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Using stable isotope (δOecologia · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shifts in metabolic fuel use coincide with maximal rates of ventilation and body surface rewarming in an arousing hibernator.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Seven unconfirmed ideas to improve future ICU practice.Critical care (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marshall D McCueSt. Mary's University, San Antonio, TX, USA. mmccue1@stmarytx.edu.
Kenneth C WelchUniversity of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.
St. Mary's University, Texas · USThe Scarborough Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carbon isotope values in the exhaled breath of an animal mirror the carbon isotope values of the metabolic fuels being oxidized. The measurement of stable carbon isotopes in carbon dioxide is called (13)C-breath testing and offers a minimally invasive method to study substrate oxidation in vivo. (13)C-breath testing has been broadly used to study human exercise, nutrition, and pathologies since the 1970s. Owing to reduced use of radioactive isotopes and the increased convenience and affordability of (13)C-analyzers, the past decade has witnessed a sharp increase in the use of breath testing throughout comparative physiology--especially to answer questions about how and when animals oxidize particular nutrients. Here, we review the practical aspects of (13)C-breath testing and identify the strengths and weaknesses of different methodological approaches including the use of natural abundance versus artificially-enriched (13)C tracers. We critically compare the information that can be obtained using different experimental protocols such as diet-switching versus fuel-switching. We also discuss several factors that should be considered when designing breath testing experiments including extrinsic versus intrinsic (13)C-labelling and different approaches to model nutrient oxidation. We use case studies to highlight the myriad applications of (13)C-breath testing in basic and clinical human studies as well as comparative studies of fuel use, energetics, and carbon turnover in multiple vertebrate and invertebrate groups. Lastly, we call for increased and rigorous use of (13)C-breath testing to explore a variety of new research areas and potentially answer long standing questions related to thermobiology, locomotion, and nutrition.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBreath TestsCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesDietFastingHumansLipid MetabolismPlantsStarchTemperatureAmino AcidsCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesStarchAmino acidsBioenergeticsCarbohydrate metabolismDigestionDiseaseExerciseFatty acidsFlightLipid metabolismMetabolic fuelMetabolic tracersMetabolismNutritionProtein metabolismStarvation

Identifiers

PMID26660654
OpenAlexW2227982888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.