Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26660621›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2016

Adenine methylation in eukaryotes: Apprehending the complex evolutionary history and functional potential of an epigenetic modification.

Lakshminarayan M Iyer, Dapeng Zhang, L Aravind

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Engineering Bisubstrates to Target mChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. eLife · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Integration of epigenetics into ecotoxicology: insights and fundamental research needs.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dual modes of DNA NProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Caenorhabditis Elegans as a Model for Environmental Epigenetics.Current environmental health reports · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Structures and mechanisms of the RNA mActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. METTL Family in Healthy and Disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lakshminarayan M IyerNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Dapeng ZhangNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
L AravindNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Center for Biotechnology Information · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Evolutionary Analysis and Comparative Genomics of Protein SuperfamiliesZIALM594244 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ARAVIND, L · 2009 to 2025
$20.3M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While N(6) -methyladenosine (m(6) A) is a well-known epigenetic modification in bacterial DNA, it remained largely unstudied in eukaryotes. Recent studies have brought to fore its potential epigenetic role across diverse eukaryotes with biological consequences, which are distinct and possibly even opposite to the well-studied 5-methylcytosine mark. Adenine methyltransferases appear to have been independently acquired by eukaryotes on at least 13 occasions from prokaryotic restriction-modification and counter-restriction systems. On at least four to five instances, these methyltransferases were recruited as RNA methylases. Thus, m(6) A marks in eukaryotic DNA and RNA might be more widespread and diversified than previously believed. Several m(6) A-binding protein domains from prokaryotes were also acquired by eukaryotes, facilitating prediction of potential readers for these marks. Further, multiple lineages of the AlkB family of dioxygenases have been recruited as m(6) A demethylases. Although members of the TET/JBP family of dioxygenases have also been suggested to be m(6) A demethylases, this proposal needs more careful evaluation. Also watch the Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularTranscription, Genetic5-MethylcytosineAdenineAmino Acid SequenceChromatinDioxygenasesDNA MethylationEukaryotaMethyltransferases5-MethylcytosineAdenineChromatinDioxygenasesMethyltransferasesadenine methylationchromatindioxygenasesmethyltransferasesmodified DNArestriction modificationtranscription regulation

Identifiers

PMID26660621
PMCPMC4738411
OpenAlexW2196335438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.