ArticlePhysiological reports2015
Contributions of cardiac "funny" (f) channels and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ in regulating beating rate of mouse and guinea pig sinoatrial node.
Article in Physiological reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing mechanisms to control heart rhythm and initiate arrhythmias: roles for intracellular organelles, signalling pathways and subsarcolemmal CaPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Autonomic modulation of sinoatrial node: Role of pacemaker current and calcium sensitive adenylyl cyclase isoforms.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2021Review
- Protein Kinase 2Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018Article
- Positive Feedback Mechanisms among Local Ca Releases, NCX, and IBiophysical journal · 2018Article
- Contributions of cardiac "funny" (f) channels and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ in regulating beating rate of mouse and guinea pig sinoatrial node.Physiological reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on spontaneous beating rate of mouse atrial preparations following selective block of cardiac "funny" (f) channels, I(f), and/or suppression of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) function in the absence and presence of β-adrenoceptor stimulation. ZD7288 [to block I(f)] caused a substantial reduction (222 ± 13 bpm) in beating rate from 431 ± 14 to 209 ± 14 bpm, ryanodine alone (to block SR Ca(2+) release) reduced beating rate by 105 ± 11 bpm, with subsequent addition of ZD7288 further reducing rate by 57 ± 9 bpm. Cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) alone (to inhibit Ca(2+) reuptake by the SR) reduced beating rate by 148 ± 13 bpm with subsequent addition of ZD7288 further reducing rate by 79 ± 12 bpm. In additional experiments measuring Ca(2+) transients in the SA node region using Rhod-2, effects of ivabradine and ZD7288 on rate were again substantially reduced after CPA. Effects of CPA alone on rate developed much more slowly than effects on Ca(2+) transient amplitude. ZD7288, ivabradine, and CPA reduced the slope and maximum response of the log(concentration)-response curves for effects of isoprenaline on beating rate. Very little response to isoprenaline remained after treatment with CPA followed by ZD7288. Similar changes in isoprenaline log(concentration)-response curves were seen in guinea pig preparations. These observations are consistent with a role for Ca(2+) released from the SR in regulating I(f) and therefore beating rate of SA node preparations; there appear to be additional contributions of SR-derived Ca(2+) to effects of β-adrenoceptor stimulation on beating rate that are independent of I(f).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.