Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26660448›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Blunted striatal response to monetary reward anticipation during smoking abstinence predicts lapse during a contingency-managed quit attempt.

Maggie M Sweitzer, Charles F Geier, Rachel Denlinger, Erika E Forbes, Bethany R Raiff, Jesse Dallery, F J McClernon, Eric C Donny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using Neuroscience to Inform Tobacco Control Policy.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Review
  15. The Effects of Nicotine and Tobacco Use on Brain Reward Function: Interaction With Nicotine Dependence Severity.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maggie M SweitzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3527, Durham, NC, USA. maggie.sweitzer@duke.edu.
Charles F GeierDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Rachel DenlingerDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Erika E ForbesDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Bethany R RaiffDepartment of Psychology, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Jesse DalleryDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
F J McClernonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3527, Durham, NC, USA.
Eric C DonnyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Targeting reward dysfunction as a mechanism to improve smoking cessationK23DA039294 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SWEITZER, MAGGIE M · 2016 to 2020
$817k
Polymorphisms Related to Dopamine Receptor Function and SmokingR03DA027441 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONNY, ERIC CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2010
$426k
NIDA NIH HHS DA027441NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA039294NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA027441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTobacco smoking is associated with dysregulated reward processing within the striatum, characterized by hypersensitivity to smoking rewards and hyposensitivity to non-smoking rewards. This bias toward smoking reward at the expense of alternative rewards is further exacerbated by deprivation from smoking, which may contribute to difficulty maintaining abstinence during a quit attempt.

objectiveWe examined whether abstinence-induced changes in striatal processing of rewards predicted lapse likelihood during a quit attempt supported by contingency management (CM), in which abstinence from smoking was reinforced with money.

methodsThirty-six non-treatment-seeking smokers participated in two functional MRI (fMRI) sessions, one following 24-h abstinence and one following smoking as usual. During each scan, participants completed a rewarded guessing task designed to elicit striatal activation in which they could earn smoking and monetary rewards delivered after the scan. Participants then engaged in a 3-week CM-supported quit attempt.

resultsAs previously reported, 24-h abstinence was associated with increased striatal activation in anticipation of smoking reward and decreased activation in anticipation of monetary reward. Individuals exhibiting greater decrements in right striatal activation to monetary reward during abstinence (controlling for activation during non-abstinence) were more likely to lapse during CM (p < 0.025), even when controlling for other predictors of lapse outcome (e.g., craving); no association was seen for smoking reward.

conclusionsThese results are consistent with a growing number of studies indicating the specific importance of disrupted striatal processing of non-drug reward in nicotine dependence and highlight the importance of individual differences in abstinence-induced deficits in striatal function for smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalRewardAdolescentAdultAgedCravingFemaleHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotivationNeostriatumRecurrenceSmokingAbstinenceCessationContingency managementfMRINicotineRelapseRewardSmokingVentral striatumWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID26660448
PMCPMC5330670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.