Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26660392›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2016

The dawn of active genetics.

Valentino M Gantz, Ethan Bier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Eliminating malaria vectors with precision-guided sterile males.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentino M GantzSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ethan BierSection of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

The Molecular Genetics of Early NeurogenesisR56NS029870 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BIER, ETHAN · 2013 to 2013
$392k
Analyzing Anthrax Toxins in DrosophiliaR56AI070654 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BIER, ETHAN · 2013 to 2013
$364k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI070654NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS029870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On December 18, 2014, a yellow female fly quietly emerged from her pupal case. What made her unique was that she had only one parent carrying a mutant allele of this classic recessive locus. Then, one generation later, after mating with a wild-type male, all her offspring displayed the same recessive yellow phenotype. Further analysis of other such yellow females revealed that the construct causing the mutation was converting the opposing chromosome with 95% efficiency. These simple results, seen also in mosquitoes and yeast, open the door to a new era of genetics wherein the laws of traditional Mendelian inheritance can be bypassed for a broad variety of purposes. Here, we consider the implications of this fundamentally new form of "active genetics," its applications for gene drives, reversal and amplification strategies, its potential for contributing to cell and gene therapy strategies, and ethical/biosafety considerations associated with such active genetic elements. Also watch the Video Abstract.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedChromosomesCRISPR-Cas SystemsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene EditingGenes, RecessiveMaleMutationPhenotypeactive geneticscopy cat elementDrosophilaERACRgene driveMCRmutagenic chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID26660392
PMCPMC5819344
OpenAlexW2192219557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.