Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26660343›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Tissue-Specific Differences in DNA Modifications (5-Hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-Formylcytosine, 5-Carboxylcytosine and 5-Hydroxymethyluracil) and Their Interrelationships.

Daniel Gackowski, Ewelina Zarakowska, Marta Starczak, Martyna Modrzejewska, Ryszard Olinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanisms of hepatic dysfunction in Nile tilapia (Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Oxidation Products of 5-Methylcytosine are Decreased in Senescent Cells and Tissues of Progeroid Mice.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel GackowskiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Ewelina ZarakowskaDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marta StarczakDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Martyna ModrzejewskaDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Ryszard OlinskiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLCollegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReplication-independent active/enzymatic demethylation may be an important process in the functioning of somatic cells. The most plausible mechanisms of active 5-methylcytosine demethylation, leading to activation of previously silenced genes, involve ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins that participate in oxidation of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can be further oxidized to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Recently, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine was demonstrated to be a relatively stable modification, and the previously observed substantial differences in the level of this modification in various murine tissues were shown to depend mostly on cell proliferation rate. Some experimental evidence supports the hypothesis that 5-hydroxymethyluracil may be also generated by TET enzymes and has epigenetic functions.

resultsUsing an isotope-dilution automated online two-dimensional ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, we have analyzed, for the first time, all the products of active DNA demethylation pathway: 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine, 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxycytidine, 5-formyl-2'-deoxycytidine and 5-carboxyl-2'-deoxycytidine, as well as 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine, in DNA isolated from various rat and porcine tissues. A strong significant inverse linear correlation was found between the proliferation rate of cells and the global level of 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxycytidine in both porcine (R2 = 0.88) and rat tissues (R2 = 0.83); no such relationship was observed for 5-formyl-2'-deoxycytidine and 5-carboxyl-2'-deoxycytidine. Moreover, a substrate-product correlation was demonstrated for the two consecutive steps of iterative oxidation pathway: between 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxycytidine and its product 5-formyl-2'-deoxycytidine, as well as between 5-formyl-2'-deoxycytidine and 5-carboxyl-2'-deoxycytidine (R2 = 0.60 and R2 = 0.71, respectively).

conclusionsGood correlations within the substrate-product sets of iterative oxidation pathway may suggest that a part of 5-formyl-2'-deoxycytidine and/or 5-carboxyl-2'-deoxycytidine can be directly linked to a small portion of 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxycytidine which defines the active demethylation process.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, Genetic5-MethylcytosineAnimalsBrain ChemistryChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCytosineDioxygenasesDNADNA MethylationGene ExpressionKidneyLiverLungMaleMyocardiumOrgan Specificity5-carboxylcytosine5-formylcytosine5-hydroxymethylcytosine5-hydroxymethyluracil5-MethylcytosineCytosineDioxygenasesDNAPentoxylTET1 protein, rat

Identifiers

PMID26660343
PMCPMC4682766
OpenAlexW2469972840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.