Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26660276›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics

Incorporating Genetic Heterogeneity in Whole-Genome Regressions Using Interactions.

Gustavo de Los Campos, Yogasudha Veturi, Ana I Vazquez, Christina Lehermeier, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic selection for morphological and yield-related traits using genome-wide SNPs in oil palm.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Complex-Trait Prediction in the Era of Big Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gustavo de Los CamposDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, 909 Fee Road, Room B601, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA ; Department of Statistics & Probability, Michigan State University, 619 Red Cedar Rd., East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Yogasudha VeturiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Ryals Public Health Bldg. 443, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA.
Ana I VazquezDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, 909 Fee Road, Room B601, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Christina LehermeierDepartment of Plant Breeding, Technische Universität München, Liesel-Beckmann-Str. 2, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Km. 36.5, Carretera Mexico, Montecillo, 56230 Texcoco, Estado de México Mexico.

Funding

Statistical Tools for Whole-Genome Prediction of Complex Traits and DiseasesR01GM101219 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2017
$1.6M
Factors Affecting Prediction Accuracy of Complex Human Traits and DiseasesR01GM099992 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DE LOS CAMPOS, GUSTAVO · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099992NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturally and artificially selected populations usually exhibit some degree of stratification. In Genome-Wide Association Studies and in Whole-Genome Regressions (WGR) analyses, population stratification has been either ignored or dealt with as a potential confounder. However, systematic differences in allele frequency and in patterns of linkage disequilibrium can induce sub-population-specific effects. From this perspective, structure acts as an effect modifier rather than as a confounder. In this article, we extend WGR models commonly used in plant and animal breeding to allow for sub-population-specific effects. This is achieved by decomposing marker effects into main effects and interaction components that describe group-specific deviations. The model can be used both with variable selection and shrinkage methods and can be implemented using existing software for genomic selection. Using a wheat and a pig breeding data set, we compare parameter estimates and the prediction accuracy of the interaction WGR model with WGR analysis ignoring population stratification (across-group analysis) and with a stratified (i.e., within-sub-population) WGR analysis. The interaction model renders trait-specific estimates of the average correlation of effects between sub-populations; we find that such correlation not only depends on the extent of genetic differentiation in allele frequencies between groups but also varies among traits. The evaluation of prediction accuracy shows a modest superiority of the interaction model relative to the other two approaches. This superiority is the result of better stability in performance of the interaction models across data sets and traits; indeed, in almost all cases, the interaction model was either the best performing model or it performed close to the best performing model. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Supplementary materials for this article are available at 10.1007/s13253-015-0222-5.

Indexed as

BayesianGenomic predictionGenomic selectionMulti-breed analysisPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID26660276
PMCPMC4666286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.