ArticleJournal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics
Incorporating Genetic Heterogeneity in Whole-Genome Regressions Using Interactions.
Article in Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fast analysis of biobank-size data and meta-analysis using the BGLR R-package.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Pooled it
- Harnessing genomic prediction in Brassica napus through a nested association mapping population.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2025Article
- Regularized multi-trait multi-locus linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection in crops.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Use of genomic prediction to screen sorghum B-lines in hybrid testcrosses.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Genomic selection for genotype performance and environmental stability in Coffea canephora.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Sparse kernel models provide optimization of training set design for genomic prediction in multiyear wheat breeding data.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Genomic selection for morphological and yield-related traits using genome-wide SNPs in oil palm.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022Article
- Using an incomplete block design to allocate lines to environments improves sparse genome-based prediction in plant breeding.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Assessing combining abilities, genomic data, and genotype × environment interactions to predict hybrid grain sorghum performance.The plant genome · 2021Article
- Article
- Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.Genetics · 2020Article
- Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Genomic selection for lentil breeding: Empirical evidence.The plant genome · 2020Article
- Exploring the Potential Genetic Heterogeneity in the Incidence of Hoof Disorders in Austrian Fleckvieh and Braunvieh Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Genomic Selection for Prediction of Fruit-Related Traits in Pepper (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Modeling Heterogeneity in the Genetic Architecture of Ethnically Diverse Groups Using Random Effect Interaction Models.Genetics · 2019Article
- Extensions of BLUP Models for Genomic Prediction in Heterogeneous Populations: Application in a Diverse Switchgrass Sample.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Complex-Trait Prediction in the Era of Big Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturally and artificially selected populations usually exhibit some degree of stratification. In Genome-Wide Association Studies and in Whole-Genome Regressions (WGR) analyses, population stratification has been either ignored or dealt with as a potential confounder. However, systematic differences in allele frequency and in patterns of linkage disequilibrium can induce sub-population-specific effects. From this perspective, structure acts as an effect modifier rather than as a confounder. In this article, we extend WGR models commonly used in plant and animal breeding to allow for sub-population-specific effects. This is achieved by decomposing marker effects into main effects and interaction components that describe group-specific deviations. The model can be used both with variable selection and shrinkage methods and can be implemented using existing software for genomic selection. Using a wheat and a pig breeding data set, we compare parameter estimates and the prediction accuracy of the interaction WGR model with WGR analysis ignoring population stratification (across-group analysis) and with a stratified (i.e., within-sub-population) WGR analysis. The interaction model renders trait-specific estimates of the average correlation of effects between sub-populations; we find that such correlation not only depends on the extent of genetic differentiation in allele frequencies between groups but also varies among traits. The evaluation of prediction accuracy shows a modest superiority of the interaction model relative to the other two approaches. This superiority is the result of better stability in performance of the interaction models across data sets and traits; indeed, in almost all cases, the interaction model was either the best performing model or it performed close to the best performing model. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: Supplementary materials for this article are available at 10.1007/s13253-015-0222-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.