ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2016
Opportunities and challenges for quality and safety applications in ICD-11: an international survey of users of coded health data.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of data sources and ascertainment methods on reporting paediatric genetic condition prevalence: A scoping review.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026Article
- Coding rules for uncertain and "ruled out" diagnoses in ICD-10 and ICD-11.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- The potential and pitfalls of using a large language model such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, or LLaMA as a clinical assistant.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Preliminary study of patient safety and quality use cases for ICD-11 MMS.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Problems and Barriers during the Process of Clinical Coding: a Focus Group Study of Coders' Perceptions.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
- Determinants of inappropriate hospitalization in cataract surgery in the south of Italy: a retrospective study.International ophthalmology · 2019Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the Development of ICD-11 in Medical Informatics.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019Article
- Leveraging Shannon Entropy to Validate the Transition between ICD-10 and ICD-11.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) plans to release the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The overall goal of the WHO is to produce a new disease classification that has an enhanced ability to capture health concepts in a manner that is compatible with contemporary information systems. Accordingly, our objective was to identify opportunities and challenges in improving the utility of ICD-11 for quality and safety applications.
designA survey study of international stakeholders with expertise in either the production or use of coded health data.
settingInternational producers or users of ICD-coded health care data. STUDY
participantsWe used a snowball sampling approach to identify individuals with relevant expertise in 12 countries, mostly from North America, Europe, and Australasia. An 8-item online survey included questions on demographic characteristics, familiarity with ICD, experience using ICD-coded data on healthcare quality and safety, opinions regarding the use of ICD classification systems for quality and safety measurement, and current limitations and potential future improvements that would permit better coding of quality and safety concepts in ICD-11.
resultsTwo-hundred fifty-eight unique individuals accessed the online survey; 246 provided complete responses. The respondents identified specific desires for the ICD revision: more code content for adverse events/complications; a desire for code clustering mechanisms; the need for diagnosis timing information; and the addition of better code definitions to reference materials.
conclusionThese findings reinforce the vision and existing work plan of the WHO's ICD revision process, because each of these desires is being addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.