Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26659922›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Rings Reconcile Genotypic and Phenotypic Evolution within the Proteobacteria.

James A Lake, Joseph Larsen, Brooke Sarna, Rafael R de la Haba, Yiyi Pu, HyunMin Koo, Jun Zhao, Janet S Sinsheimer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncovering the Genomic Origins of Life.Genome biology and evolution · 2018
    Article
  2. Nanocomposites Based on Biodegradable Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

James A LakeUniversity of California, Los Angeles lake@mbi.ucla.edu.
Joseph LarsenUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Brooke SarnaUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Rafael R de la HabaUniversity of California, Los Angeles University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Yiyi PuUniversity of California, Los Angeles Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.
HyunMin KooUniversity of California, Los Angeles University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Jun ZhaoUniversity of California, Los Angeles Peking University, Beijing, China.
Janet S SinsheimerUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Bayesian Joint Estimation of Alignment and PhylogenyR01GM086887 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SUCHARD, MARC A. · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM086887NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although prokaryotes are usually classified using molecular phylogenies instead of phenotypes after the advent of gene sequencing, neither of these methods is satisfactory because the phenotypes cannot explain the molecular trees and the trees do not fit the phenotypes. This scientific crisis still exists and the profound disconnection between these two pillars of evolutionary biology--genotypes and phenotypes--grows larger. We use rings and a genomic form of goods thinking to resolve this conundrum (McInerney JO, Cummins C, Haggerty L. 2011. Goods thinking vs. tree thinking. Mobile Genet Elements. 1:304-308; Nelson-Sathi S, et al. 2015. Origins of major archaeal clades correspond to gene acquisitions from bacteria. Nature 517:77-80). The Proteobacteria is the most speciose prokaryotic phylum known. It is an ideal phylogenetic model for reconstructing Earth's evolutionary history. It contains diverse free living, pathogenic, photosynthetic, sulfur metabolizing, and symbiotic species. Due to its large number of species (Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Wiebe WJ. 1998. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 95:6578-6583) it was initially expected to provide strong phylogenetic support for a proteobacterial tree of life. But despite its many species, sequence-based tree analyses are unable to resolve its topology. Here we develop new rooted ring analyses and study proteobacterial evolution. Using protein family data and new genome-based outgroup rooting procedures, we reconstruct the complex evolutionary history of the proteobacterial rings (combinations of tree-like divergences and endosymbiotic-like convergences). We identify and map the origins of major gene flows within the rooted proteobacterial rings (P < 3.6 × 10(-6)) and find that the evolution of the "Alpha-," "Beta-," and "Gammaproteobacteria" is represented by a unique set of rings. Using new techniques presented here we also root these rings using outgroups. We also map the independent flows of genes involved in DNA-, RNA-, ATP-, and membrane- related processes within the Proteobacteria and thereby demonstrate that these large gene flows are consistent with endosymbioses (P < 3.6 × 10(-9)). Our analyses illustrate what it means to find that a gene is present, or absent, within a gene flow, and thereby clarify the origin of the apparent conflicts between genotypes and phenotypes. Here we identify the gene flows that introduced photosynthesis into the Alpha-, Beta-, and Gammaproteobacteria from the common ancestor of the Actinobacteria and the Firmicutes. Our results also explain why rooted rings, unlike trees, are consistent with the observed genotypic and phenotypic relationships observed among the various proteobacterial classes. We find that ring phylogenies can explain the genotypes and the phenotypes of biological processes within large and complex groups like the Proteobacteria.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene FlowGenotypePhenotypeModels, GeneticPhotosynthesisProteobacteriaSymbiosischlorophyllsendosymbiosesgene losses/gainsgenotypesphenotypesphylogenetic classificationrooting rings

Identifiers

PMID26659922
PMCPMC4700952
OpenAlexW2198587485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.