ReviewHerz2016
Established interventions for mitral valve regurgitation. Current evidence.
Review in Herz, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Transaortic repair of concomitant mitral insufficiency in patients with critical aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valvular replacement.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2019Article
- Clinical features and treatment options for mitral regurgitation in elderly inpatients.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is a growing medical challenge in today's aging population, leading to increased health expenditure due to the resultant morbidity and mortality. Surgery, either replacement or repair, has been the mainstay of therapy for primary MR. In high-risk or inoperable patients, treatment was limited to medical therapy until 2008. Since then, alternative percutaneous therapies have been introduced and have proven to be safe and effective in patients with secondary MR. Edge-to-edge repair with the MitraClip system is applied worldwide for primary and secondary MR. Randomized data do not support its application in low-risk patients with primary MR. Results from ongoing and future randomized trials will clarify its impact on important clinical endpoints in high-risk and inoperable patients. The Carillon device is a percutaneous indirect annuloplasty technique introduced in 2009 for secondary MR. Clinical data for the novel Cardioband system, using a different intra-atrial annuloplasty technique, have been gathered from more than 40 patients and the system recently received CE mark approval. Other percutaneous repair devices and implantable valves are under development and may be introduced into clinical practice soon. The percutaneous interventional therapy of MR is a highly dynamic field of cardiovascular medicine and has the potential to improve quality of life as well as morbidity and mortality in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.