Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26659762›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2016

Development of a cross-cultural deprivation index in five European countries.

Elodie Guillaume, Carole Pornet, Olivier Dejardin, Ludivine Launay, Roberto Lillini, Marina Vercelli, Marc Marí-Dell'Olmo, Amanda Fernández Fontelo, Carme Borrell, Ana Isabel Ribeiro and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. A scoping review of multiple deprivation indices in Europe.European journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Elodie GuillaumeFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research-Caen University, U1086 "Cancers & Préventions", Caen, France.
Carole PornetFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research-Caen University, U1086 "Cancers & Préventions", Caen, France Pôle Recherche, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-5076
Olivier DejardinFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research-Caen University, U1086 "Cancers & Préventions", Caen, France Pôle Recherche, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
Ludivine LaunayFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research-Caen University, U1086 "Cancers & Préventions", Caen, France Centre François Baclesse, Avenue du Général Harris-BP5026, Caen, France.
Roberto LilliniDepartment of Sociology, PhD School in Applied Sociology and Methodology of Research, University of Milan-Bicocca, Genoa, Italy Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marina VercelliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Marc Marí-Dell'OlmoCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
Amanda Fernández FonteloAgència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carme BorrellCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana Isabel RibeiroInstituto de Engenharia Biomédica-INEB, Universidade do Porto-Departamento de Epidemiologia Clínica, Medicina Preditiva e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina do Porto, Universidade do Porto-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto-ISPUP, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Fatima de PinaInstituto de Engenharia Biomédica-INEB, Universidade do Porto-Departamento de Epidemiologia Clínica, Medicina Preditiva e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina do Porto, Universidade do Porto-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto-ISPUP, Porto, Portugal.
Alexandra MayerRegistro Oncologico Regional Sul, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cyrille DelpierreINSERM, U1027, Toulouse F-31300, Toulouse, France Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, UMR1027, Toulouse F-31300, Toulouse, France.
Bernard RachetCancer Survival Group, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Guy LaunoyFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research-Caen University, U1086 "Cancers & Préventions", Caen, France Pôle Recherche, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a concerted policy effort in Europe, social inequalities in health are a persistent problem. Developing a standardised measure of socioeconomic level across Europe will improve the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and causes of inequalities. This will facilitate developing, implementing and assessing new and more effective policies, and will improve the comparability and reproducibility of health inequality studies among countries. This paper presents the extension of the European Deprivation Index (EDI), a standardised measure first developed in France, to four other European countries-Italy, Portugal, Spain and England, using available 2001 and 1999 national census data. METHODS AND

resultsThe method previously tested and validated to construct the French EDI was used: first, an individual indicator for relative deprivation was constructed, defined by the minimal number of unmet fundamental needs associated with both objective (income) poverty and subjective poverty. Second, variables available at both individual (European survey) and aggregate (census) levels were identified. Third, an ecological deprivation index was constructed by selecting the set of weighted variables from the second step that best correlated with the individual deprivation indicator.

conclusionsFor each country, the EDI is a weighted combination of aggregated variables from the national census that are most highly correlated with a country-specific individual deprivation indicator. This tool will improve both the historical and international comparability of studies, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying social inequalities in health and implementation of intervention to tackle social inequalities in health.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonPovertyAgedEuropeFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleRegression AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesDEPRIVATIONHealth inequalitiesMeasurement tool DevelopmentPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL INEQUALITIES

Identifiers

PMID26659762
PMCPMC4853548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.