Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26659730›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2017

Effects of prefrontal rTMS on autonomic reactions to affective pictures.

Christoph Berger, Gregor Domes, Johannes Balschat, Johannes Thome, Jacqueline Höppner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Mechanistic link between right prefrontal cortical activity and anxious arousal revealed using transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christoph BergerDepartment of Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy in Childhood and Adolescence, University Medical Center of Rostock, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany. christoph.berger@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0832-5526
Gregor DomesLaboratory for Biological and Personality Psychology, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Straße 8, 79104, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Johannes BalschatDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Johannes ThomeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Jacqueline HöppnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can modulate the excitability of stimulated cortical areas, such as prefrontal areas involved in emotion regulation. Low frequency (LF) rTMS is expected to have inhibitory effects on prefrontal regions, and thereby should disinhibit limbic activity, resulting in enhanced emotional and autonomic reactions. For high frequency (HF) rTMS, the opposite pattern might be assumed. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of different rTMS frequencies applied to the right dlPFC on autonomic functions and on emotional perception. In a crossover design, two groups of 20 healthy young women were either stimulated with one session of LF rTMS (1 Hz) or one session of HF rTMS (10 Hz), compared to sham stimulation. We assessed phasic cardiac responses (PCR), skin conductance reactions (SCR), and emotional appraisal of emotional pictures as well as recognition memory after each rTMS application. After LF rTMS, PCR (heart rate deceleration) during presentation of pictures with negative and neutral valence was significantly increased compared to the presentation of positive pictures. In contrast, the modulatory effect of picture valence and arousal on the cardiac orienting response was absent after HF rTMS. Our results suggest that frontal LF rTMS indirectly activates the ANS via inhibition of the right dlPFC activity, likely by enhancing the sensory processing or attention to aversive and neutral stimuli.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAnalysis of VarianceAutonomic Nervous SystemCross-Over StudiesEmotionsFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexRecognition, PsychologySingle-Blind MethodVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAutonomic nervous systemdlPFCHeart rateRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationrTMSSkin conductance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.