Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26659705›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2015

Modern stem cell therapy: approach to disease.

Mateja Zemljic, Bozena Pejkovic, Ivan Krajnc, Lidija Kocbek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mateja ZemljicInstitute of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, Maribor, Slovenia. mateja.zemljic@um.si.
Bozena PejkovicInstitute of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, Maribor, Slovenia.
Ivan KrajncDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, Maribor, Slovenia.
Lidija KocbekInstitute of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, Maribor, Slovenia.
University of Maribor · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various types of stem cells exist, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Considering the current available evidence, important preclinical and clinical studies regarding the therapeutic potential of stem cells, stem cell therapy might be the important strategy for tissue repair. The development of stem cell therapy for tissue repair has primarily relied on stem cells, especially mesenchymal stem cells. Multilineage differentiation into all of the described cells are considered as important candidates for a range of diseases like neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal cancer and genetic defects, as well as for acute and chronic wounds healing and pharmaceutical treatment. We review the properties and multipotency of stem cells and their differentiation potential, once cultured under specific growth conditions, for use in cell-based therapies and functional tissue replacement.

Indexed as

Stem Cell ResearchAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationTissue EngineeringCell-based therapyDifferentiationDiseaseStem cellTissue replacement

Identifiers

PMID26659705
OpenAlexW2280710209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.