Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26659616›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Antibacterial Peptide-Based Gel for Prevention of Medical Implanted-Device Infection.

Mihaela Mateescu, Sébastien Baixe, Tony Garnier, Loic Jierry, Vincent Ball, Youssef Haikel, Marie Hélène Metz-Boutigue, Michel Nardin, Pierre Schaaf, Olivier Etienne and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The dental implant surface: a review of the past, present and future.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Hydrogels in Oral Disease Management: A Review of Innovations in Drug Delivery and Tissue Regeneration.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Immobilised antimicrobial peptides in downregulation of biofilm.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Peptides in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Antimicrobial Peptides: A Potent Alternative to Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mihaela MateescuInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Sébastien BaixeInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Tony GarnierInstitut Charles Sadron, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Loic JierryInstitut Charles Sadron, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Vincent BallInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Youssef HaikelInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Marie Hélène Metz-BoutigueInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Michel NardinInstitut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique LRC 7228, Mulhouse, France.
Pierre SchaafInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier EtienneInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Philippe LavalleInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche-S 1121, Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie, Strasbourg, France.
Université de Strasbourg · FRBiomatériaux et Bioingénierie · FRInstitut Charles Sadron · FRInstitut de Sciences des Matériaux de Mulhouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implanted medical devices are prone to infection. Designing new strategies to reduce infection and implant rejection are an important challenge for modern medicine. To this end, in the last few years many hydrogels have been designed as matrices for antimicrobial molecules destined to fight frequent infection found in moist environments like the oral cavity. In this study, two types of original hydrogels containing the antimicrobial peptide Cateslytin have been designed. The first hydrogel is based on alginate modified with catechol moieties (AC gel). The choice of these catechol functional groups which derive from mussel's catechol originates from their strong adhesion properties on various surfaces. The second type of gel we tested is a mixture of alginate catechol and thiol-terminated Pluronic (AC/PlubisSH), a polymer derived from Pluronic, a well-known biocompatible polymer. This PlubisSH polymer has been chosen for its capacity to enhance the cohesion of the composition. These two gels offer new clinical uses, as they can be injected and jellify in a few minutes. Moreover, we show these gels strongly adhere to implant surfaces and gingiva. Once gelled, they demonstrate a high level of rheological properties and stability. In particular, the dissipative energy of the (AC/PlubisSH) gel detachment reaches a high value on gingiva (10 J.m-2) and on titanium alloys (4 J.m-2), conferring a strong mechanical barrier. Moreover, the Cateslytin peptide in hydrogels exhibited potent antimicrobial activities against P. gingivalis, where a strong inhibition of bacterial metabolic activity and viability was observed, indicating reduced virulence. Gel biocompatibility tests indicate no signs of toxicity. In conclusion, these new hydrogels could be ideal candidates in the prevention and/or management of periimplant diseases.

Indexed as

AlginatesAlloysAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiocompatible MaterialsCatecholsCell AdhesionCell LineCell SurvivalChromogranin ADental ImplantsGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePeptide FragmentsPoloxamerAlginatesAlloysAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiocompatible MaterialscatecholCatecholsChromogranin Achromogranin A (344-358)Dental ImplantsGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePeptide FragmentsPoloxamerPolymers

Identifiers

PMID26659616
PMCPMC4682826
OpenAlexW2416493653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.