Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26659242›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Teus J Weijs, Jelle P Ruurda, Misha D P Luyer, Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen, Sylvia van der Horst, Ronald L A W Bleys, Richard van Hillegersberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Teus J WeijsDepartment of Surgery Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Misha D P LuyerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Grard A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Sylvia van der HorstDepartment of Surgery Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronald L A W BleysDepartment of Anatomy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.vanhillegersberg@umcutrecht.nl.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DECatharina Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary vagus branches are transected as part of a transthoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy for cancer. This may contribute to the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Studies in which sparing of the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy is investigated are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the feasibility and pitfalls of sparing pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

methodsIn 10 human cadavers, a thoracoscopic esophagectomy was performed while sparing the pulmonary vagus nerve branches. The number of intact nerve branches, their distribution over the lung lobes and the number and location of the remaining lymph nodes in the relevant esophageal lymph node stations (7, 10R and 10L) were recorded during microscopic dissection.

resultsA median of 9 (range 5-16) right pulmonary vagus nerve branches were spared, of which 4 (0-12) coursed to the right middle/inferior lung lobe. On the left side, 10 (3-12) vagus nerve branches were spared, of which 4 (2-10) coursed to the inferior lobe. In 8 cases, lymph nodes were left behind, at stations 10R and 10L while sparing the vagus nerve branches. Lymph nodes at station 7 were always removed.

conclusionsSparing of pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy is feasible. Extra care should be given to the dissection of peribronchial lymph nodes, station 10R and 10L.

Indexed as

Vagus NerveCadaverDissectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesHumansLungLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPostoperative ComplicationsMediastinal lymphadenectomyPulmonary complicationsPulmonary nervesThoracoscopic esophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID26659242
OpenAlexW2192893661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.