Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26658964›Full record

ReviewCancer discovery2016

Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: From Discovery to Therapy.

Charles J Sherr, David Beach, Geoffrey I Shapiro

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer discovery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 538 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
538citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
54.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

538 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 927 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

478 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charles J SherrHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD. Department of Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. geoffrey_shapiro@dfci.harvard.edu sherr@stjude.org.
David BeachThe Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey I ShapiroEarly Drug Development Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. geoffrey_shapiro@dfci.harvard.edu sherr@stjude.org.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USQueen Mary University of London · GBSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Tissue and Pathology CoreP50CA168504 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Nabihah Tayob · 2013 to 2026
$30.1M
Variation in Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Breast Cancer RiskP50CA089393 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WINER, ERIC P · 2000 to 2009
$28.8M
Flavopiridol Mediated Apoptosis During S Phase in NSCLCR01CA090687 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SHAPIRO, GEOFFREY I · 2001 to 2014
$4.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS CA-21765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS P50 CA089393NCI NIH HHS P50 CA168504NCI NIH HHS P50-CA168504NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090687NCI NIH HHS R01-CA090687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledBiochemical and genetic characterization of D-type cyclins, their cyclin D-dependent kinases (CDK4 and CDK6), and the polypeptide CDK4/6 inhibitor p16(INK4)over two decades ago revealed how mammalian cells regulate entry into the DNA synthetic (S) phase of the cell-division cycle in a retinoblastoma protein-dependent manner. These investigations provided proof-of-principle that CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly when combined with coinhibition of allied mitogen-dependent signal transduction pathways, might prove valuable in cancer therapy. FDA approval of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib used with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole for breast cancer treatment highlights long-sought success. The newest findings herald clinical trials targeting other cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: Rapidly emerging data with selective inhibitors of CDK4/6 have validated these cell-cycle kinases as anticancer drug targets, corroborating longstanding preclinical predictions. This review addresses the discovery of these CDKs and their regulators, as well as translation of CDK4/6 biology to positive clinical outcomes and development of rational combinatorial therapies.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell CycleClinical Trials as TopicCyclin DCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Drug DiscoveryGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsCyclin DCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26658964
PMCPMC4821753
OpenAlexW2219817965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.