ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2016
Learning and memory performance in breast cancer survivors 2 to 6 years post-treatment: the role of encoding versus forgetting.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations Between Breast Cancer Survivorship and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018Pooled it
- Cognitive profiles and predictors of cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors: integrating self-reported, neuropsychological, and process-based measures.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026Article
- The effect of cancer and cancer treatment on attention control: evidence from anti-saccade performance.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Cognitive function in long-term survivors after treatment for brain metastases compared with normative samples.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Limitations of standard memory assessments in breast cancer survivors.Translational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Novel computerized neurocognitive test battery is sensitive to cancer-related cognitive deficits in survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Exercise Associated with Cognitive Function in Older Men with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Androgen Deprivation Therapy.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Remote, Computerised Cognitive Assessment for Breast Cancer- and Treatment-Related Cognitive Dysfunction: Psychometric Characteristics of the Cogsuite Neurocognitive Battery.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023Article
- Longitudinal Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment on Neural Correlates of Attention.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023Article
- Initial encoding deficits with intact memory retention in older long-term breast cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
- Sensory Filtering and Sensory Memory in Breast Cancer Survivors.Clinical EEG and neuroscience · 2021Article
- Prospective evaluation of functional brain activity and oxidative damage in breast cancer: changes in task-induced deactivation during a working memory task.Brain imaging and behavior · 2021Article
- Strategies to Prevent or Remediate Cancer and Treatment-Related Aging.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- The role of metamemory on cognitive complaints in cancer patients.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
- Verbal Learning and Memory Function and the Influencing Factors on Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2019Article
- Longitudinal Trajectory and Characterization of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in a Nationwide Cohort Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Article
- Cognitive Effects of Cancer and Cancer Treatments.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2018Review
- Neuropsychological Practice in the Oncology Setting.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2018Article
- Trajectories of Cognitive Function and Associated Phenotypic and Genotypic Factors in Breast Cancer.Oncology nursing forum · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOur previous retrospective analysis of clinically referred breast cancer survivors' performance on learning and memory measures found a primary weakness in initial encoding of information into working memory with intact retention and recall of this same information at a delay. This suggests that survivors may misinterpret cognitive lapses as being due to forgetting when, in actuality, they were not able to properly encode this information at the time of initial exposure. Our objective in this study was to replicate and extend this pattern of performance to a research sample to increase the generalizability of this finding in a sample in which subjects were not clinically referred for cognitive issues.
methodsWe contrasted learning and memory performance between breast cancer survivors on endocrine therapy 2 to 6 years post-treatment with age- and education-matched healthy controls. We then stratified lower- and higher-performing breast cancer survivors to examine specific patterns of learning and memory performance. Contrasts were generated for four aggregate visual and verbal memory variables from the California Verbal Learning Test-2 (CVLT-2) and the Brown Location Test (BLT): Single-trial Learning: Trial 1 performance, Multiple-trial Learning: Trial 5 performance, Delayed Recall: Long-delay Recall performance, and Memory Errors: False-positive errors.
resultsAs predicted, breast cancer survivors' performance as a whole was significantly lower on Single-trial Learning than the healthy control group but exhibited no significant difference in Delayed Recall. In the secondary analysis contrasting lower- and higher-performing survivors on cognitive measures, the same pattern of lower Single-trial Learning performance was exhibited in both groups, with the additional finding of significantly weaker Multiple-trial Learning performance in the lower-performing breast cancer group and intact Delayed Recall performance in both groups.
conclusionsAs with our earlier finding of weaker initial encoding with intact recall in a cohort of clinically referred breast cancer survivors, our results indicate this same profile in a research sample of breast cancer survivors. Further, when the breast cancer group was stratified by lower and higher performance, both groups exhibited significantly lower performance on initial encoding, with more pronounced encoding weakness in the lower-performing group. As in our previous research, survivors did not lose successfully encoded information over longer delays, either in the lower- or higher-performing group, again arguing against memory decay in survivors. The finding of weaker initial encoding of information together with intact delayed recall in survivors points to specific treatment interventions in rehabilitation of cognitive dysfunction. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The finding of weaker initial encoding of information together with intact delayed recall in survivors points to specific treatment interventions in rehabilitation of cognitive dysfunction and is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.