Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26658888›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2016

Prognostic role of ERCC1 protein expression in upper tract urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent.

Aurélie Mbeutcha, Ilaria Lucca, Vitaly Margulis, Jose A Karam, Christopher G Wood, Michela de Martino, Romain Mathieu, Andrea Haitel, Evanguelos Xylinas, Luis Kluth and 15 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 16 institutions in 6 countries.

Aurélie MbeutchaDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ilaria LuccaDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Vitaly MargulisDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jose A KaramDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Christopher G WoodDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Michela de MartinoDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Romain MathieuDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea HaitelDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Evanguelos XylinasDepartment of Urology Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Luis KluthDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Morgan RouprêtDepartment of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris VI, Paris, France.
Pierre I KarakiewiczDepartment of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alberto BrigantiDipartimento di Urologia, Ospedale S. Raffaele, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy.
Michael RinkDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Malte RiekenDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alon Z WeizerDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jay D RamanDivision of Urology, Penn State Milton S.Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Nathalie Rioux-LeclecqDepartment of Pathology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Christian BolenzDepartment of Urology, Mannheim Medical Center, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Karim BensalahDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Christian SeitzDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Mesut RemziDepartment of Urology, Landeskrankenhaus Weinviertel-Korneuburg, Korneuburg, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. sfshariat@gmail.com.
Tobias KlatteDepartment of Urology, Vienna General Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Vienna General Hospital · ATCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversität Hamburg · DECornell University · USDélégation Paris 5 · FRHeidelberg University · DELandesklinikum Korneuburg · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) has been associated with outcomes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, but was not yet studied in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic role of ERCC1 expression in a large international cohort of UTUC patients.

methodsImmunohistochemical ERCC1 expression was evaluated in 716 UTUC patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent. ERCC1 was considered positive when the H-score was >1.0. Associations with overall survival and cancer-specific survival were assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox models.

resultsERCC1 was expressed in 303 tumors (42.3 %) and linked with the presence of tumor necrosis (16.2 vs. 10.4 %, p = 0.023), but not with any other clinical or pathological variable. ERCC1 status did not predict cancer-specific survival and overall survival on both univariable (p = 0.70 and 0.32, respectively) and multivariable analyses (p = 0.48 and 0.33, respectively).

conclusionsERCC1 is expressed in a significant proportion of UTUC and is linked with tumor necrosis, but its expression appears not to be associated with prognosis following radical nephroureterectomy.

Indexed as

NephrectomyAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUreterUreteral NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, humanAdjuvantCisplatinERCC1PredictionPrognosisSurvivalUpper tractUrothelial

Identifiers

PMID26658888
OpenAlexW2295555919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.