Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26658872›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Sequential Retraction Segregates SGN Processes during Target Selection in the Cochlea.

Noah R Druckenbrod, Lisa V Goodrich

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Age-dependent structural reorganization of utricular ribbon synapses.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Specification of neuronal subtypes in the spiral ganglion begins prior to birth in the mouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Semaphorin-5B Controls Spiral Ganglion Neuron Branch Refinement during Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Differential Expression of CaExperimental neurobiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noah R DruckenbrodDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Lisa V GoodrichDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Lisa_Goodrich@hms.harvard.edu.

Funding

Genetic Dissection of Auditory Circuit AssemblyR01DC009223 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Lisa Goodrich · 2009 to 2026
$8.4M
FUNDAMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGYT32NS007484 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI REGEHR, WADE G · 2000 to 2014
$5.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009223NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark of the nervous system is the presence of precise patterns of connections between different types of neurons. Many mechanisms can be used to establish specificity, including homophilic adhesion and synaptic refinement, but the range of strategies used across the nervous system remains unclear. To broaden the understanding of how neurons find their targets, we studied the developing murine cochlea, where two classes of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs), type I and type II, navigate together to the sensory epithelium and then diverge to contact inner hair cells (IHCs) or outer hair cells (OHCs), respectively. Neurons with type I and type II morphologies are apparent before birth, suggesting that target selection might be accomplished by excluding type I processes from the OHC region. However, because type I processes appear to overshoot into type II territory postnatally, specificity may also depend on elimination of inappropriate synapses. To resolve these differences, we analyzed the morphology and dynamic behaviors of individual fibers and their branches as they interact with potential partners. We found that SGN processes continue to be segregated anatomically in the postnatal cochlea. Although type I-like fibers branched locally, few branches contacted OHCs, arguing against synaptic elimination. Instead, time-lapse imaging studies suggest a prominent role for retraction, first positioning processes to the appropriate region and then corralling branches during a subsequent period of exuberant growth and refinement. Thus, sequential stages of retraction can help to achieve target specificity, adding to the list of mechanisms available for sculpting neural circuits. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: During development, different types of neurons must form connections with specific synaptic targets, thereby creating the precise wiring diagram necessary for adult function. Although studies have revealed multiple mechanisms for target selection, we still know little about how different strategies are used to produce each circuit's unique pattern of connectivity. Here we combined neurite-tracing and time-lapse imaging to define the events that lead to the simple binary wiring specificity of the cochlea. A better understanding of how the cochlea is innervated will broaden our knowledge of target selection across the nervous system, offer new insights into the developmental origins of deafness, and guide efforts to restore connectivity in the damaged cochlea.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCochleaEmbryo, MammalianHair Cells, Auditory, InnerHair Cells, Auditory, OuterImaging, Three-DimensionalIn Vitro TechniquesLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalNerve Tissue ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBhlhe22 protein, mouseLuminescent ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurog1 protein, mouseauditorycochleacochlear developmentrefinementspiral ganglion neurontarget selection

Identifiers

PMID26658872
PMCPMC4682787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.