Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26658774›Full record

Observational studyBMJ quality & safety2016

Risk-adjusted survival for adults following in-hospital cardiac arrest by day of week and time of day: observational cohort study.

Emily J Robinson, Gary B Smith, Geraldine S Power, David A Harrison, Jerry Nolan, Jasmeet Soar, Ken Spearpoint, Carl Gwinnutt, Kathryn M Rowan

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ quality & safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. The weekend effect revisited: evidence from the Upper Austrian stroke registry.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emily J RobinsonIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.
Gary B SmithFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of Bournemouth, Bournemouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2070-8455
Geraldine S PowerIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.
David A HarrisonIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9002-9098
Jerry NolanDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Jasmeet SoarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Ken SpearpointResuscitation Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Carl GwinnuttResuscitation Council (UK), London, UK.
Kathryn M RowanIntensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GBBournemouth University · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBResuscitation Council · GBRoyal United Hospital · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternationally, hospital survival is lower for patients admitted at weekends and at night. Data from the UK National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA) indicate that crude hospital survival was worse after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) at night versus day, and at weekends versus weekdays, despite similar frequency of events.

objectiveTo describe IHCA demographics during three day/time periods-weekday daytime (Monday to Friday, 08:00 to 19:59), weekend daytime (Saturday and Sunday, 08:00 to 19:59) and night-time (Monday to Sunday, 20:00 to 07:59)-and to compare the associated rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for >20 min (ROSC>20 min) and survival to hospital discharge, adjusted for risk using previously developed NCAA risk models. To consider whether any observed difference could be attributed to differences in the case mix of patients resident in hospital and/or the administered care.

methodsWe performed a prospectively defined analysis of NCAA data from 27 700 patients aged ≥16 years receiving chest compressions and/or defibrillation and attended by a hospital-based resuscitation team in response to a resuscitation (2222) call in 146 UK acute hospitals.

resultsRisk-adjusted outcomes (OR (95% CI)) were worse (p<0.001) for both weekend daytime (ROSC>20 min 0.88 (0.81 to 0.95); hospital survival 0.72 (0.64 to 0.80)), and night-time (ROSC>20 min 0.72 (0.68 to 0.76); hospital survival 0.58 (0.54 to 0.63)) compared with weekday daytime. The effects were stronger for non-shockable than shockable rhythms, but there was no significant interaction between day/time of arrest and age, or day/time of arrest and arrest location. While many daytime IHCAs involved procedures, restricting the analyses to IHCAs in medical admissions with an arrest location of ward produced results that are broadly in line with the primary analyses.

conclusionsIHCAs attended by the hospital-based resuscitation team during nights and weekends have substantially worse outcomes than during weekday daytimes. Organisational or care differences at night and weekends, rather than patient case mix, appear to be responsible.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationDiagnosis-Related GroupsFemaleHeart ArrestHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleProspective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsUnited KingdomAdverse events, epidemiology and detectionAudit and feedbackHospital medicineMortality (standardized mortality ratios)Patient safety

Identifiers

PMID26658774
PMCPMC5136724
OpenAlexW2197538217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.