Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26658610›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2016

Intrinsically active variants of Erk oncogenically transform cells and disclose unexpected autophosphorylation capability that is independent of TEY phosphorylation.

Karina Smorodinsky-Atias, Tal Goshen-Lago, Anat Goldberg-Carp, Dganit Melamed, Alexei Shir, Navit Mooshayef, Jonah Beenstock, Yael Karamansha, Ilona Darlyuk-Saadon, Oded Livnah and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Erk1Oncogene · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Dephosphorylation of p70S6 (ThrNeurotoxicity research · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karina Smorodinsky-AtiasDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456.
Tal Goshen-LagoDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Anat Goldberg-CarpDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Dganit MelamedDepartment of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Alexei ShirDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Navit MooshayefDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456.
Jonah BeenstockDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Yael KaramanshaDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Wolfson Centre for Applied Structural Biology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Ilona Darlyuk-SaadonDepartment of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456 CREATE-NUS-HUJ, Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore 138602.
Oded LivnahDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Wolfson Centre for Applied Structural Biology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Natalie G AhnDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Arie AdmonDepartment of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
David EngelbergDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Institute of Life Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Department of Microbiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117456 CREATE-NUS-HUJ, Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore 138602 CREATE-NUS-HUJ, Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore 138602.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILNational University of Singapore · SGTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Linking Dynamics to Catalysis and Inhibition in ERK2R01GM114594 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI AHN, NATALIE G. · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The receptor-tyrosine kinase (RTK)/Ras/Raf pathway is an essential cascade for mediating growth factor signaling. It is abnormally overactive in almost all human cancers. The downstream targets of the pathway are members of the extracellular regulated kinases (Erk1/2) family, suggesting that this family is a mediator of the oncogenic capability of the cascade. Although all oncogenic mutations in the pathway result in strong activation of Erks, activating mutations in Erks themselves were not reported in cancers. Here we used spontaneously active Erk variants to check whether Erk's activity per se is sufficient for oncogenic transformation. We show that Erk1(R84S) is an oncoprotein, as NIH3T3 cells that express it form foci in tissue culture plates, colonies in soft agar, and tumors in nude mice. We further show that Erk1(R84S) and Erk2(R65S) are intrinsically active due to an unusual autophosphorylation activity they acquire. They autophosphorylate the activatory TEY motif and also other residues, including the critical residue Thr-207 (in Erk1)/Thr-188 (in Erk2). Strikingly, Erk2(R65S) efficiently autophosphorylates its Thr-188 even when dually mutated in the TEY motif. Thus this study shows that Erk1 can be considered a proto-oncogene and that Erk molecules possess unusual autoregulatory properties, some of them independent of TEY phosphorylation.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesHEK293 CellsHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMice, NudeNIH 3T3 CellsPhosphorylationProto-Oncogene MasRatsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesMAS1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Mas

Identifiers

PMID26658610
PMCPMC4791124
OpenAlexW2285828662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.