Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26658101›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2016

Heterospecific pollen deposition in Delphinium barbeyi: linking stigmatic pollen loads to reproductive output in the field.

Heather M Briggs, Lucy M Anderson, Laila M Atalla, André M Delva, Emily K Dobbs, Berry J Brosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The selfing syndrome and beyond: diverse evolutionary consequences of mating system transitions in plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather M BriggsDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA and hbriggs@ucsc.edu.
Lucy M AndersonRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA and Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Laila M AtallaRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA and Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
André M DelvaRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA and Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Emily K DobbsDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Berry J BrosiRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224, USA and Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMost pollinators are generalists and therefore are likely to transfer heterospecific pollen among co-flowering plants. Most work on the impacts of heterospecific pollen deposition on plant fecundity has utilized hand-pollination experiments in greenhouse settings, and we continue to know very little about the reproductive effects of heterospecific pollen in field settings.

methodsWe explored how patterns of naturally deposited heterospecific pollen relate to the reproductive output of Delphinium barbeyi, a common subalpine perennial herb in the Rocky Mountains (USA). We assessed a wide range of naturally occurring heterospecific pollen proportions and pollen load sizes, and linked stigmatic pollen deposition directly to seed set in individual carpels in the field. KEY

resultsWe found that heterospecific pollen deposition in D. barbeyi is common, but typically found at low levels across stigmas collected in our sites. Neither conspecific nor heterospecific pollen deposition was related to carpel abortion. By contrast, we saw a significant positive relationship between conspecific pollen amount and viable seed production, as well as a significant negative interaction between the effects of conspecific pollen and heterospecific pollen amount, whereby the effect of conspecific pollen on viable seed production became weaker with greater heterospecific deposition on stigmas.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a relationship between heterospecific pollen and seed production in a field setting. In addition, it is the first report of an interaction between conspecific and heterospecific pollen quantities on seed production. These findings, taken with the results from other studies, suggest that greenhouse hand-pollination studies and field studies should be more tightly integrated in future work to better understand how heterospecific pollen transfer can be detrimental for plant reproduction.

Indexed as

ColoradoDelphiniumFlowersPollenPollinationReproductionSeedsfield studieshand-pollination studiesinterspecific pollen transferpollen qualityseed setstigmas

Identifiers

PMID26658101
PMCPMC4724048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.