Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657860›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2016

Memory T cell-driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy.

Christopher A Klebanoff, Christopher D Scott, Anthony J Leonardi, Tori N Yamamoto, Anthony C Cruz, Claudia Ouyang, Madhu Ramaswamy, Rahul Roychoudhuri, Yun Ji, Robert L Eil and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ReducingCancer immunology research · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. CD95/Fas stoichiometry in future precision medicine.Cell death and differentiation · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biomaterial-Based Therapeutic Delivery of Immune Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher A Klebanoff
Christopher D Scott
Anthony J Leonardi
Tori N Yamamoto
Anthony C Cruz
Claudia Ouyang
Madhu Ramaswamy
Rahul Roychoudhuri
Yun Ji
Robert L Eil
Madhusudhanan Sukumar
Joseph G Crompton
Douglas C Palmer
Zachary A Borman
David Clever
Stacy K Thomas
Shashankkumar Patel
Zhiya Yu
Pawel Muranski
Hui Liu
Ena Wang
Francesco M Marincola
Alena Gros
Luca Gattinoni
Steven A Rosenberg
Richard M Siegel
Nicholas P Restifo
National Cancer Institute · USCenter for Cancer Research · USSidra Medical and Research Center · QANational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Clinical Support Services for the NIAMS Intramural Research ProgramZIDAR041180 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI COLBERT, ROBERT · 2009 to 2025
$119.2M
Adoptive Cell Transfer Immunotherapy of CancerZIABC010984 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2025
$56.8M
Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
TNF-receptors and programmed cell death in regulation of autoimmunityZIAAR041133 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI SIEGEL, RICHARD M · 2009 to 2019
$9.3M
T-T interactions between naive and memory CD8+ T cellsZIABC011586 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KLEBANOFF, CHRISTOPHER · 2014 to 2016
$306k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010763Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011586Wellcome Trust 105663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of purified naive, stem cell memory, and central memory T cell subsets results in superior persistence and antitumor immunity compared with ACT of populations containing more-differentiated effector memory and effector T cells. Despite a clear advantage of the less-differentiated populations, the majority of ACT trials utilize unfractionated T cell subsets. Here, we have challenged the notion that the mere presence of less-differentiated T cells in starting populations used to generate therapeutic T cells is sufficient to convey their desirable attributes. Using both mouse and human cells, we identified a T cell-T cell interaction whereby antigen-experienced subsets directly promote the phenotypic, functional, and metabolic differentiation of naive T cells. This process led to the loss of less-differentiated T cell subsets and resulted in impaired cellular persistence and tumor regression in mouse models following ACT. The T memory-induced conversion of naive T cells was mediated by a nonapoptotic Fas signal, resulting in Akt-driven cellular differentiation. Thus, induction of Fas signaling enhanced T cell differentiation and impaired antitumor immunity, while Fas signaling blockade preserved the antitumor efficacy of naive cells within mixed populations. These findings reveal that T cell subsets can synchronize their differentiation state in a process similar to quorum sensing in unicellular organisms and suggest that disruption of this quorum-like behavior among T cells has potential to enhance T cell-based immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryImmunotherapy, AdoptiveAnimalsCell DifferentiationFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorFemaleMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktT-LymphocytesFas Ligand ProteinFas protein, mousefas ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID26657860
PMCPMC4701537
OpenAlexW2211359813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.