Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657537›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2016

Computational approaches to predict bacteriophage-host relationships.

Robert A Edwards, Katelyn McNair, Karoline Faust, Jeroen Raes, Bas E Dutilh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Computational Microbial and Viral Ecology Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert A EdwardsDepartment of Computer Science, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA 92182, USA Department of Marine Biology, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941-902, Brazil Division of Mathematics and Computer Science, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439, USA.
Katelyn McNairDepartment of Computer Science, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Karoline FaustDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Laboratory of Microbiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Jeroen RaesDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium VIB Center for the Biology of Disease, VIB, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Laboratory of Microbiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Bas E DutilhDepartment of Marine Biology, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941-902, Brazil Theoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, the Netherlands Centre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands bedutilh@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics has changed the face of virus discovery by enabling the accurate identification of viral genome sequences without requiring isolation of the viruses. As a result, metagenomic virus discovery leaves the first and most fundamental question about any novel virus unanswered: What host does the virus infect? The diversity of the global virosphere and the volumes of data obtained in metagenomic sequencing projects demand computational tools for virus-host prediction. We focus on bacteriophages (phages, viruses that infect bacteria), the most abundant and diverse group of viruses found in environmental metagenomes. By analyzing 820 phages with annotated hosts, we review and assess the predictive power of in silico phage-host signals. Sequence homology approaches are the most effective at identifying known phage-host pairs. Compositional and abundance-based methods contain significant signal for phage-host classification, providing opportunities for analyzing the unknowns in viral metagenomes. Together, these computational approaches further our knowledge of the interactions between phages and their hosts. Importantly, we find that all reviewed signals significantly link phages to their hosts, illustrating how current knowledge and insights about the interaction mechanisms and ecology of coevolving phages and bacteria can be exploited to predict phage-host relationships, with potential relevance for medical and industrial applications.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsBacteriaBacteriophagesGenome, ViralHost-Pathogen Interactionsco-occurrenceCRISPRmetagenomicsoligonucleotide usagephagesviruses of microbes

Identifiers

PMID26657537
PMCPMC5831537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.