Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657508›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Towards understanding the breast cancer epigenome: a comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression data.

Sandeep K Singhal, Nawaid Usmani, Stefan Michiels, Otto Metzger-Filho, Kamal S Saini, Olga Kovalchuk, Matthew Parliament

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Curcumin: the spicy modulator of breast carcinogenesis.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sandeep K SinghalDepartment of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Nawaid UsmaniDepartment of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Stefan MichielsService de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Otto Metzger-FilhoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kamal S SainiQuantum Health Analytics SPRL, Liège, Belgium.
Olga KovalchukDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.
Matthew ParliamentDepartment of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAHarvard University · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRUniversity of Lethbridge · CAUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, an elevated disease risk has been ascribed to a genetic predisposition, however, exciting progress over the past years has discovered alternate elements of inheritance that involve epigenetic regulation. Epigenetic changes are heritably stable alterations that include DNA methylation, histone modifications and RNA-mediated silencing. Aberrant DNA methylation is a common molecular basis for a number of important human diseases, including breast cancer. Changes in DNA methylation profoundly affect global gene expression patterns. What is emerging is a more dynamic and complex association between DNA methylation and gene expression than previously believed. Although many tools have already been developed for analyzing genome-wide gene expression data, tools for analyzing genome-wide DNA methylation have not yet reached the same level of refinement. Here we provide an in-depth analysis of DNA methylation in parallel with gene expression data characteristics and describe the particularities of low-level and high-level analyses of DNA methylation data. Low-level analysis refers to pre-processing of methylation data (i.e. normalization, transformation and filtering), whereas high-level analysis is focused on illustrating the application of the widely used class comparison, class prediction and class discovery methods to DNA methylation data. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of DNA methylation on gene expression by measuring the correlation between the degree of CpG methylation and the level of expression and to explore the pattern of methylation as a function of the promoter region.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChromosome MappingCpG IslandsDNADNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticDNAbreast cancerDNA methylationepigeneticsexpressionmicroarray

Identifiers

PMID26657508
PMCPMC4823086
OpenAlexW2264592921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.