Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657471›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

High contrast microstructural visualization of natural acellular matrices by means of phase-based x-ray tomography.

Charlotte K Hagen, Panagiotis Maghsoudlou, Giorgia Totonelli, Paul C Diemoz, Marco Endrizzi, Luigi Rigon, Ralf-Hendrik Menk, Fulvia Arfelli, Diego Dreossi, Emmanuel Brun and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Edge-illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent advances in edge illumination x-ray phase-contrast tomography.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Charlotte K HagenUniversity College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Panagiotis MaghsoudlouUniversity College London, Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Giorgia TotonelliUniversity College London, Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Paul C DiemozUniversity College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Marco EndrizziUniversity College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Luigi RigonUniversity of Trieste, Department of Physics, Trieste, 34127, Italy.
Ralf-Hendrik MenkSincrotrone Trieste SCpA, Basovizza/Trieste, 34012, Italy.
Fulvia ArfelliUniversity of Trieste, Department of Physics, Trieste, 34127, Italy.
Diego DreossiSincrotrone Trieste SCpA, Basovizza/Trieste, 34012, Italy.
Emmanuel BrunEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, 38043, France.
Paola CoanLudwig Maximilians University, Department of Physics, Garching, 85748, Germany.
Alberto BravinEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, 38043, France.
Paolo De CoppiUniversity College London, Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Alessandro OlivoUniversity College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health RP_2014-04-046Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acellular scaffolds obtained via decellularization are a key instrument in regenerative medicine both per se and to drive the development of future-generation synthetic scaffolds that could become available off-the-shelf. In this framework, imaging is key to the understanding of the scaffolds' internal structure as well as their interaction with cells and other organs, including ideally post-implantation. Scaffolds of a wide range of intricate organs (esophagus, lung, liver and small intestine) were imaged with x-ray phase contrast computed tomography (PC-CT). Image quality was sufficiently high to visualize scaffold microarchitecture and to detect major anatomical features, such as the esophageal mucosal-submucosal separation, pulmonary alveoli and intestinal villi. These results are a long-sought step for the field of regenerative medicine; until now, histology and scanning electron microscopy have been the gold standard to study the scaffold structure. However, they are both destructive: hence, they are not suitable for imaging scaffolds prior to transplantation, and have no prospect for post-transplantation use. PC-CT, on the other hand, is non-destructive, 3D and fully quantitative. Importantly, not only do we demonstrate achievement of high image quality at two different synchrotron facilities, but also with commercial x-ray equipment, which makes the method available to any research laboratory.

Indexed as

AnimalsEsophagusImage EnhancementImaging, Three-DimensionalIntestine, SmallLiverLungRabbitsRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsSynchrotronsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID26657471
PMCPMC4677348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.