Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657458›Full record

ReviewPloS one2015

Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews.

Gemma Pearce, Hilary Pinnock, Eleni Epiphaniou, Hannah L Parke, Emily Heavey, Christopher J Griffiths, Trish Greenhalgh, Aziz Sheikh, Stephanie J C Taylor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06264050 (The Influence of a Psychological Support Group on Mood, Anxiety, Coping Skills of Patients Admitted to Neurorehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06264050 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Influence of a Psychological Support Group on Mood, Anxiety, Coping Skills of Patients Admitted to Neurorehabilitation: a Pre-post Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRan2004 to 2025Enrolled19ConditionsCoping Strategies, Anxiety, Nurse-Patient Relations, PsychologicalArmsevalutaion scales
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Theory-Based Self-Management Interventions for Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Qualitative Exploration of Stroke Survivors' Experiences of Using a Stroke Helpline.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma PearceCentre for Technology Enabled Health Research (CTEHR), Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Hilary PinnockCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eleni Epiphanioumultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah L Parkemultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Emily HeaveySocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Christopher J Griffithsmultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Trish GreenhalghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Medical Sciences division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Aziz SheikhCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stephanie J C Taylormultidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (mEsh), Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBCoventry University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health 11/1014/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupporting self-management in stroke patients improves psychological and functional outcomes but evidence on how to achieve this is sparse. We aimed to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews of qualitative studies in an overarching meta-review to inform the delivery and development of self-management support interventions.

methodsWe systematically searched eight electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL for qualitative systematic reviews (published January 1993 to June 2012). We included studies exploring patients', carers' or health care professionals' experiences relevant to self-management support following a stroke, including studies describing the lived experience of surviving a stroke. We meta-synthesised the included review findings using a meta-ethnographic framework.

resultsSeven reviews, reporting 130 unique studies, were included. Themes emerging from the reviews were pertinent, consistent and showed data saturation; though explicit mention of self-management support was rare. Our meta-review highlighted the devastating impact of stroke on patients' self-image; the varying needs for self-management support across the trajectory of recovery; the need for psychological and emotional support throughout recovery particularly when physical recovery plateaus; the considerable information needs of patients and carers which also vary across the trajectory of recovery; the importance of good patient-professional communication; the potential benefits of goal-setting and action-planning; and the need for social support which might be met by groups for stroke survivors.

conclusionsThe observed data saturation suggests that, currently, no further qualitative research simply describing the lived experience of stroke is needed; we propose that it would be more useful to focus on qualitative research informing self-management support interventions and their implementation. Our findings demonstrate both the on-going importance of self-management support and the evolving priorities throughout the stages of recovery following a stroke. The challenge now is to ensure these findings inform routine practice and the development of interventions to support self-management amongst stroke survivors.

Indexed as

Self CareStroke RehabilitationHumansStrokeSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26657458
PMCPMC4682853
OpenAlexW2216710999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.