Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657224›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Maternal colonization of group B streptococcus: prevalence, associated factors and antimicrobial resistance.

Mubashir Ahmad Khan, Aftab Faiz, Ahmad Mohammad Ashshi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Vaginal group BiScience · 2025
    Article
  5. Evaluation of Group BMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neonatal Group BSaudi medical journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Group BPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An Initial Survey on the Prevalence of Group BInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mubashir Ahmad KhanProf. Mubashir Ahmad Khan, Department of Laboratory Medicine,, Umm Al Qura University,, PO Box 7607, Makkah 21955,, Saudi Arabia, T: 966-509-010-825, mubashirpmrc@yahoo.com.
Aftab Faiz
Ahmad Mohammad Ashshi
Umm al-Qura University · SAMaternity and Children's Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGroup B streptococcus (GBS, Streptococcus agalactiae) can be transferred during delivery to neonates from mothers who are colonized with GBS in the genital tract. GBS can cause sepsis and meningitis in newborns. This study was conducted to determine GBS colonization rates among pregnant women and the antibiotic sensitivity patterns. DESIGN AND

settingProspective descriptive study at the Maternity and Children Hospital, Makkah. PATIENTS AND

methodsVaginal swabs from 1328 pregnant women (>=35 weeks of gestation) attending antenatal clinic were cultured in Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with gentamicin and nalidixic acid. After 36 hours of incubation, subculture was made onto sheep blood agar and incubated in 5% carbon dioxide for 18 to 24 hours. A Microscan Walk Away system was used for the identification and antibiotic susceptibility of GBS isolates. Each isolate was also tested for group B by using latex slide agglutination test. Information such as maternal age, gestational age and parity was collected using a predesigned questionnaire.

resultsThe study population ranged between ages 17-47 years. The GBS colonization in all age groups was found to be 13.4%. A higher colonization rate was seen in pregnant women > 40 years of age (27.4%). Women with gestational age > 42 weeks were colonized (25%) more frequently that women with a gestational age from 41-42 weeks (20.2%). An increased rate of colonization was found in women who delivered > 5 times and no colonization in women who delivered once. All GBS isolates were 100% sensitive to penicillin G, ampicillin and vancomycin. Erythromycin and clindamycin showed resistance-15.7% and 5.1%, respectively.

conclusionThe high prevalence of GBS colonization in pregnant women demands for screening in women attending an antenatal clinic so that intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis can be offered to all women who are colonized with GBS, thus preventing its transfer to the newborn.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceProspective StudiesSaudi ArabiaStreptococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26657224
PMCPMC6074477
OpenAlexW2294502951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.