Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657114›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Molecular classification of non-invasive breast lesions for personalised therapy and chemoprevention.

Niamh Buckley, David Boyle, Darragh McArt, Gareth Irwin, D Paul Harkin, Tong Lioe, Stephen McQuaid, Jacqueline A James, Perry Maxwell, Peter Hamilton and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: an update for the pathologist in the era of individualized risk assessment and tailored therapies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Review
  5. Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2018
    Review
  6. Single-cell heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niamh BuckleyCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
David BoyleCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Darragh McArtCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Gareth IrwinCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
D Paul HarkinCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Tong LioeDepartment of Histopathology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Stephen McQuaidCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Jacqueline A JamesCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Perry MaxwellCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Peter HamiltonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Paul B MullanCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Manuel Salto-TellezCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Queen's University Belfast · GBBelfast City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer screening has led to a dramatic increase in the detection of pre-invasive breast lesions. While mastectomy is almost guaranteed to treat the disease, more conservative approaches could be as effective if patients can be stratified based on risk of co-existing or recurrent invasive disease.Here we use a range of biomarkers to interrogate and classify purely non-invasive lesions (PNL) and those with co-existing invasive breast cancer (CEIN). Apart from Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS), relative homogeneity is observed. DCIS contained a greater spread of molecular subtypes. Interestingly, high expression of p-mTOR was observed in all PNL with lower expression in DCIS and invasive carcinoma while the opposite expression pattern was observed for TOP2A.Comparing PNL with CEIN, we have identified p53 and Ki67 as predictors of CEIN with a combined PPV and NPV of 90.48% and 43.3% respectively. Furthermore, HER2 expression showed the best concordance between DCIS and its invasive counterpart.We propose that these biomarkers can be used to improve the management of patients with pre-invasive breast lesions following further validation and clinical trials. p53 and Ki67 could be used to stratify patients into low and high-risk groups for co-existing disease. Knowledge of expression of more actionable targets such as HER2 or TOP2A can be used to design chemoprevention or neo-adjuvant strategies. Increased knowledge of the molecular profile of pre-invasive lesions can only serve to enhance our understanding of the disease and, in the era of personalised medicine, bring us closer to improving breast cancer care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingChemopreventionFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorbiomarkerDCISmolecular pathologyPathology Sectionpersonalised medicinepre-invasive breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID26657114
PMCPMC4791229
OpenAlexW2190117163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.