Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26657016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Transgenic banana plants expressing Xanthomonas wilt resistance genes revealed a stable non-target bacterial colonization structure.

Jean Nimusiima, Martina Köberl, John Baptist Tumuhairwe, Jerome Kubiriba, Charles Staver, Gabriele Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean NimusiimaNational Agricultural Research Organisation, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda.
Martina KöberlGraz University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Austria.
John Baptist TumuhairweMakerere University, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Department of Agricultural Production, Kampala, Uganda.
Jerome KubiribaNational Agricultural Research Organisation, National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kampala, Uganda.
Charles StaverBioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Gabriele BergGraz University of Technology, Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Austria.
Graz University of Technology · ATNational Agricultural Research Organisation · UGInstitut Agro Montpellier · FRMakerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Africa is among the continents where the battle over genetically modified crops is currently being played out. The impact of GM in Africa could potentially be very positive. In Uganda, researchers have developed transgenic banana lines resistant to banana Xanthomonas wilt. The transgenic lines expressing hrap and pflp can provide a timely solution to the pandemic. However, the impact of the transgenes expression on non-target microorganisms has not yet been investigated. To study this effect, transgenic and control lines were grown under field conditions and their associated microbiome was investigated by 16S rRNA gene profiling combining amplicon sequencing and molecular fingerprinting. Three years after sucker planting, no statistically significant differences between transgenic lines and their non-modified predecessors were detected for their associated bacterial communities. The overall gammaproteobacterial rhizosphere microbiome was highly dominated by Xanthomonadales, while Pseudomonadales and Enterobacteriales were accumulated in the pseudostem. Shannon indices revealed much higher diversity in the rhizosphere than in the pseudostem endosphere. However, the expression of the transgenes did not result in changes in the diversity of Gammaproteobacteria, the closest relatives of the target pathogen. In this field experiment, the expression of the resistance genes appears to have no consequences for non-target rhizobacteria and endophytes.

Indexed as

BacteriaCapsicumCrops, AgriculturalDisease ResistanceGenes, PlantHost-Pathogen InteractionsMicrobiotaMusaPlant DiseasesPlants, Genetically ModifiedPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16STransgenesXanthomonas campestrisRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26657016
PMCPMC4674801
OpenAlexW2290117362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.