Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656987›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Protocol for ACCESS: a qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators to accessing the emergency contraceptive pill from community pharmacies in Australia.

Safeera Yasmeen Hussainy, Ayesha Ghosh, Angela Taft, Danielle Mazza, Kirsten Isla Black, Rhonda Clifford, Sajni Gudka, Kevin Peter Mc Namara, Kath Ryan, John Keith Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Geographic disparities in accessing community pharmacies among vulnerable populations in the Greater Toronto Area.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Safeera Yasmeen HussainyCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ayesha GhoshCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Angela TaftJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Danielle MazzaDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kirsten Isla BlackSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rhonda CliffordSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Sajni GudkaSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-9435
Kevin Peter Mc NamaraCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Deakin University and Flinders University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kath RyanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
John Keith JacksonCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rate of unplanned pregnancy in Australia remains high, which has contributed to Australia having one of the highest abortion rates of developed countries with an estimated 1 in 5 women having an abortion. The emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) offers a safe way of preventing unintended pregnancy after unprotected sex has occurred. While the ECP has been available over-the-counter in Australian pharmacies for over a decade, its use has not significantly increased. This paper presents a protocol for a qualitative study that aims to identify the barriers and facilitators to accessing the ECP from community pharmacies in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data will be collected through one-on-one interviews that are semistructured and in-depth. Partnerships have been established with 2 pharmacy groups and 2 women's health organisations to aid with the recruitment of women and pharmacists for data collection purposes. Interview questions explore domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework in order to assess the factors aiding and/or hindering access to ECP from community pharmacies. Data collected will be analysed using deductive content analysis. The expected benefits of this study are that it will help develop evidence-based workforce interventions to strengthen the capacity and performance of community pharmacists as key ECP providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings will be disseminated to the research team and study partners, who will brainstorm ideas for interventions that would address barriers and facilitators to access identified from the interviews. Dissemination will also occur through presentations and peer-reviewed publications and the study participants will receive an executive summary of the findings. The study has been evaluated and approved by the Monash Human Research Ethics Committee.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, PostcoitalHealth Services AccessibilityNonprescription DrugsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultClinical ProtocolsContraception, PostcoitalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedQualitative ResearchVictoriaYoung AdultContraceptives, PostcoitalNonprescription DrugsPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINESEXUAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26656987
PMCPMC4679989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.