Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656971›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2016

Proteomic analysis of fatty-acylated proteins.

Tao Peng, Emmanuelle Thinon, Howard C Hang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Chemical proteomics approaches for protein post-translational modification studies.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemical Proteomics Reveals NMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024
    Article
  6. Amino acid and protein specificity of protein fatty acylation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao PengLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Emmanuelle ThinonLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, United States; The Crick Institute, 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, United Kingdom.
Howard C HangLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: hhang@rockefeller.edu.
Rockefeller University · USThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Studies on Protein LipidationR01GM087544 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI HANG, HOWARD C · 2010 to 2023
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein fatty-acylation in eukaryotes has been associated with many fundamental biological processes. However, the diversity, abundance and regulatory mechanisms of protein fatty-acylation in vivo remain to be explored. Herein, we review the proteomic analysis of fatty-acylated proteins, with a focus on N-myristoylation and S-palmitoylation. We then highlight major challenges and emerging methods for direct site identification, quantitation, and lipid structure characterization to understand the functions and regulatory mechanisms of fatty-acylated proteins in physiology and disease.

Indexed as

AcylationAnimalsFatty AcidsHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsProteomicsFatty AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26656971
PMCPMC4731282
OpenAlexW2186822602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.