Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656740›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Property Graph vs RDF Triple Store: A Comparison on Glycan Substructure Search.

Davide Alocci, Julien Mariethoz, Oliver Horlacher, Jerven T Bolleman, Matthew P Campbell, Frederique Lisacek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dealing with the Ambiguity of Glycan Substructure Search.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A consensus-based and readable extension ofBeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2020
    Article
  8. glypy: An Open Source Glycoinformatics Library.Journal of proteome research · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Glycomics@ExPASy: Bridging the Gap.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Davide AlocciProteome Informatics Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Julien MariethozProteome Informatics Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Oliver HorlacherProteome Informatics Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Jerven T BollemanSwiss-Prot Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
Matthew P CampbellDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Frederique LisacekProteome Informatics Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resource description framework (RDF) and Property Graph databases are emerging technologies that are used for storing graph-structured data. We compare these technologies through a molecular biology use case: glycan substructure search. Glycans are branched tree-like molecules composed of building blocks linked together by chemical bonds. The molecular structure of a glycan can be encoded into a direct acyclic graph where each node represents a building block and each edge serves as a chemical linkage between two building blocks. In this context, Graph databases are possible software solutions for storing glycan structures and Graph query languages, such as SPARQL and Cypher, can be used to perform a substructure search. Glycan substructure searching is an important feature for querying structure and experimental glycan databases and retrieving biologically meaningful data. This applies for example to identifying a region of the glycan recognised by a glycan binding protein (GBP). In this study, 19,404 glycan structures were selected from GlycomeDB (www.glycome-db.org) and modelled for being stored into a RDF triple store and a Property Graph. We then performed two different sets of searches and compared the query response times and the results from both technologies to assess performance and accuracy. The two implementations produced the same results, but interestingly we noted a difference in the query response times. Qualitative measures such as portability were also used to define further criteria for choosing the technology adapted to solving glycan substructure search and other comparable issues.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalComputational BiologyMolecular StructurePolysaccharidesSoftwarePolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID26656740
PMCPMC4684231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.