ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2016
Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts.
Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Diameter Vascular Grafts Made in Minutes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Trends and Advancements in Smart Electrospun Food Fibers for the Management of Neurological Disorders.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2026Review
- Sulfated Polysaccharides in Wound Healing: From Bioactive Materials Design to Regenerative Therapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Open Challenges and Opportunities in Piezoelectricity for Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Learning-enhanced 3D fiber orientation mapping in thick cardiac tissues.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Manipulation of Surface Potential Distribution Enhances Osteogenesis by Promoting Pro-Angiogenic Macrophage Polarization via Activation of the PI3K-Akt Signaling Pathway.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric patches for healthcare.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Application of human cardiac organoids in cardiovascular disease research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Applications of Novel Microscale and Nanoscale Materials for Theranostics: From Design to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Selective Induction of Molecular Assembly to Tissue-Level Anisotropy on Peptide-Based Optoelectronic Cardiac Biointerfaces.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Article
- Fibre-infused gel scaffolds guide cardiomyocyte alignment in 3D-printed ventricles.Nature materials · 2023Article
- One Billion hiPSC-Cardiomyocytes: Upscaling Engineered Cardiac Tissues to Create High Cell Density Therapies for Clinical Translation in Heart Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Conductive fibers for biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- How to fix a broken heart-designing biofunctional cues for effective, environmentally-friendly cardiac tissue engineering.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Cardiac-Adaptive Conductive Hydrogel Patch Enabling Construction of Mechanical-Electrical Anisotropic Microenvironment for Heart Repair.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Electrochemical and Electroconductive Behavior of Silk Fibroin Electrospun Membrane Coated with Gold or Silver Nanoparticles.Membranes · 2022Article
- Continuous Microfiber Wire Mandrel-Less Biofabrication for Soft Tissue Engineering Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Cellular and Engineered Organoids for Cardiovascular Models.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Natural Polymers in Heart Valve Tissue Engineering: Strategies, Advances and Challenges.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extracellular matrix (ECM) structure and biochemistry provide cell-instructive cues that promote and regulate tissue growth, function, and repair. From a structural perspective, the ECM is a scaffold that guides the self-assembly of cells into distinct functional tissues. The ECM promotes the interaction between individual cells and between different cell types, and increases the strength and resilience of the tissue in mechanically dynamic environments. From a biochemical perspective, factors regulating cell-ECM adhesion have been described and diverse aspects of cell-ECM interactions in health and disease continue to be clarified. Natural ECMs therefore provide excellent design rules for tissue engineering scaffolds. The design of regenerative three-dimensional (3D) engineered scaffolds is informed by the target ECM structure, chemistry, and mechanics, to encourage cell infiltration and tissue genesis. This can be achieved using nanofibrous scaffolds composed of polymers that simultaneously recapitulate 3D ECM architecture, high-fidelity nanoscale topography, and bio-activity. Their high porosity, structural anisotropy, and bio-activity present unique advantages for engineering 3D anisotropic tissues. Here, we use the heart as a case study and examine the potential of ECM-inspired nanofibrous scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. We asked: Do we know enough to build a heart? To answer this question, we tabulated structural and functional properties of myocardial and valvular tissues for use as design criteria, reviewed nanofiber manufacturing platforms and assessed their capabilities to produce scaffolds that meet our design criteria. Our knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the heart, as well as our ability to create synthetic ECM scaffolds have advanced to the point that valve replacement with nanofibrous scaffolds may be achieved in the short term, while myocardial repair requires further study in vitro and in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.