Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656602›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2016

Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts.

A K Capulli, L A MacQueen, Sean P Sheehy, K K Parker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Small Diameter Vascular Grafts Made in Minutes.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Open Challenges and Opportunities in Piezoelectricity for Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Application of human cardiac organoids in cardiovascular disease research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A K CapulliDisease Biophysics Group, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
L A MacQueenDisease Biophysics Group, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sean P SheehyDisease Biophysics Group, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
K K ParkerDisease Biophysics Group, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: kkparker@seas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell and Progenitor Models of Cardiac and Blood DiseasesU01HL100408 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COWAN, CHAD ALBERT, MELTON, DOUGLAS A · 2009 to 2015
$8.9M
Human Cardio-Pulmonary System on a ChipUH3TR000522 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PARKER, KEVIN KIT · 2014 to 2016
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000522NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100408NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL100408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular matrix (ECM) structure and biochemistry provide cell-instructive cues that promote and regulate tissue growth, function, and repair. From a structural perspective, the ECM is a scaffold that guides the self-assembly of cells into distinct functional tissues. The ECM promotes the interaction between individual cells and between different cell types, and increases the strength and resilience of the tissue in mechanically dynamic environments. From a biochemical perspective, factors regulating cell-ECM adhesion have been described and diverse aspects of cell-ECM interactions in health and disease continue to be clarified. Natural ECMs therefore provide excellent design rules for tissue engineering scaffolds. The design of regenerative three-dimensional (3D) engineered scaffolds is informed by the target ECM structure, chemistry, and mechanics, to encourage cell infiltration and tissue genesis. This can be achieved using nanofibrous scaffolds composed of polymers that simultaneously recapitulate 3D ECM architecture, high-fidelity nanoscale topography, and bio-activity. Their high porosity, structural anisotropy, and bio-activity present unique advantages for engineering 3D anisotropic tissues. Here, we use the heart as a case study and examine the potential of ECM-inspired nanofibrous scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. We asked: Do we know enough to build a heart? To answer this question, we tabulated structural and functional properties of myocardial and valvular tissues for use as design criteria, reviewed nanofiber manufacturing platforms and assessed their capabilities to produce scaffolds that meet our design criteria. Our knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the heart, as well as our ability to create synthetic ECM scaffolds have advanced to the point that valve replacement with nanofibrous scaffolds may be achieved in the short term, while myocardial repair requires further study in vitro and in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHeart Conduction SystemHeart ValvesHeart VentriclesHumansMyocardial ContractionMyocardiumNanofibersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsCardiac valveElectrospinningForce spinningMyocardiumNanofiber scaffoldRegenerative medicineRotary jet spinningTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID26656602
PMCPMC4807693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.