Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656477›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2016

Invited Commentary: E Pluribus Unum for Epidemiology.

Sophia S Wang, James V Lacey

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophia S Wang
James V Lacey

Funding

NCI NIH HHS P30CA03357232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal, Amirian et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(2):85-91) present a report from the Genetic Epidemiology of Glioma International Consortium (GLIOGENE Consortium), a new international consortium of glioma case-control studies. This report is noteworthy, because the GLIOGENE Consortium represents a new generation of epidemiologic consortia. GLIOGENE investigators have created an infrastructure that addresses important limitations of first-generation consortia efforts, which comprised a posteriori harmonization of exposure data and the inclusion of studies that did not include the same--or any--exposure data. As with these first-generation consortia efforts, the GLIOGENE Consortium embraces the primary importance of sample size, and to achieve that, the consortium tolerates different study designs that permit heterogeneity in case and control ascertainment. In contrast, however, the consortium's Glioma International Case-Control (GICC) Study incorporates systematic collection of exposure data from both cases and controls to facilitate downstream evaluation of exposure associations and gene-environment interactions. The described GICC Study thus serves as a model for future epidemiologic efforts that reflects a paradigm shift whereby studies are now being conducted with the expectation of downstream collaboration, thus demanding coordination and harmonization of apparently independent efforts at the time of study initiation rather than at study completion.

Indexed as

International CooperationFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMolecular Epidemiologycancercase-control studiesconsortiadata harmonizationgenome-wide association studiesglioblastomaglioma

Identifiers

PMID26656477
PMCPMC4706683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.