ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2016
Invited Commentary: E Pluribus Unum for Epidemiology.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Melin and Bondy Respond to "E Pluribus Unum for Epidemiology".American journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue of the Journal, Amirian et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(2):85-91) present a report from the Genetic Epidemiology of Glioma International Consortium (GLIOGENE Consortium), a new international consortium of glioma case-control studies. This report is noteworthy, because the GLIOGENE Consortium represents a new generation of epidemiologic consortia. GLIOGENE investigators have created an infrastructure that addresses important limitations of first-generation consortia efforts, which comprised a posteriori harmonization of exposure data and the inclusion of studies that did not include the same--or any--exposure data. As with these first-generation consortia efforts, the GLIOGENE Consortium embraces the primary importance of sample size, and to achieve that, the consortium tolerates different study designs that permit heterogeneity in case and control ascertainment. In contrast, however, the consortium's Glioma International Case-Control (GICC) Study incorporates systematic collection of exposure data from both cases and controls to facilitate downstream evaluation of exposure associations and gene-environment interactions. The described GICC Study thus serves as a model for future epidemiologic efforts that reflects a paradigm shift whereby studies are now being conducted with the expectation of downstream collaboration, thus demanding coordination and harmonization of apparently independent efforts at the time of study initiation rather than at study completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.