Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Activity of Different Antimicrobial Peptides against a Range of Pathogenic Bacteria.

Anna Ebbensgaard, Hanne Mordhorst, Michael Toft Overgaard, Claus Gyrup Nielsen, Frank Møller Aarestrup, Egon Bech Hansen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proline-Rich Antimicrobial Peptides from Invertebrates.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ratanjot (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Skin secretions of Leptodactylidae (Anura) and their potential applications.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna EbbensgaardNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Hanne MordhorstNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Michael Toft OvergaardDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Claus Gyrup NielsenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
Frank Møller AarestrupNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Egon Bech HansenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Mørkhøj Bygade 19, 2860, Søborg, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKAalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

analysis of a selected set of antimicrobial peptidesThe rapid emergence of resistance to classical antibiotics has increased the interest in novel antimicrobial compounds. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent an attractive alternative to classical antibiotics and a number of different studies have reported antimicrobial activity data of various AMPs, but there is only limited comparative data available. The mode of action for many AMPs is largely unknown even though several models have suggested that the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) play a crucial role in the attraction and attachment of the AMP to the bacterial membrane in Gram-negative bacteria. We compared the potency of Cap18, Cap11, Cap11-1-18m2, Cecropin P1, Cecropin B, Bac2A, Bac2A-NH2, Sub5-NH2, Indolicidin, Melittin, Myxinidin, Myxinidin-NH2, Pyrrhocoricin, Apidaecin and Metalnikowin I towards Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Aeromonas salmonicida, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Salmonella typhimurium and Yersinia ruckeri by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations. Additional characteristics such as cytotoxicity, thermo and protease stability were measured and compared among the different peptides. Further, the antimicrobial activity of a selection of cationic AMPs was investigated in various E. coli LPS mutants. CAP18 SHOWS A HIGH BROAD SPECTRUM ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY: Of all the tested AMPs, Cap18 showed the most efficient antimicrobial activity, in particular against Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, Cap18 is highly thermostable and showed no cytotoxic effect in a hemolytic assay, measured at the concentration used. However, Cap18 is, as most of the tested AMPs, sensitive to proteolytic digestion in vitro. Thus, Cap18 is an excellent candidate for further development into practical use; however, modifications that should reduce the protease sensitivity would be needed. In addition, our findings from analyzing LPS mutant strains suggest that the core oligosaccharide of the LPS molecule is not essential for the antimicrobial activity of cationic AMPs, but in fact has a protective role against AMPs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialErythrocytesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHemolysisHorsesLipopolysaccharidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Sequence DataMutationPeptide HydrolasesProtein StabilityAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesLipopolysaccharidesPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID26656394
PMCPMC4684357
OpenAlexW2192685225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.