Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656288›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development and Analysis of Patient-Based Complete Conducting Airways Models.

Rafel Bordas, Christophe Lefevre, Bart Veeckmans, Joe Pitt-Francis, Catalin Fetita, Christopher E Brightling, David Kay, Salman Siddiqui, Kelly S Burrowes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Digital twins for chronic lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational lung modelling in respiratory medicine.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lung Computational Models and the Role of the Small Airways in Asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Personalized medicine for patients with COPD: where are we?International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rafel BordasComputational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christophe LefevreARTEMIS Department, CNRS UMR 8145, Telecom SudParis, Institut Mines-Telecom, Paris, France.
Bart VeeckmansMaterialise NV, Leuven, Belgium.
Joe Pitt-FrancisComputational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Catalin FetitaARTEMIS Department, CNRS UMR 8145, Telecom SudParis, Institut Mines-Telecom, Paris, France.
Christopher E BrightlingInstitute for Lung Health, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
David KayComputational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Salman SiddiquiInstitute for Lung Health, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Kelly S BurrowesComputational Biology, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) images of the lung is dependent on inter-subject differences in airway geometry. The application of computational models in understanding the significance of these differences has previously been shown to be a useful tool in biomedical research. Studies using image-based geometries alone are limited to the analysis of the central airways, down to generation 6-10, as other airways are not visible on high-resolution CT. However, airways distal to this, often termed the small airways, are known to play a crucial role in common airway diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Other studies have incorporated an algorithmic approach to extrapolate CT segmented airways in order to obtain a complete conducting airway tree down to the level of the acinus. These models have typically been used for mechanistic studies, but also have the potential to be used in a patient-specific setting. In the current study, an image analysis and modelling pipeline was developed and applied to a number of healthy (n = 11) and asthmatic (n = 24) CT patient scans to produce complete patient-based airway models to the acinar level (mean terminal generation 15.8 ± 0.47). The resulting models are analysed in terms of morphometric properties and seen to be consistent with previous work. A number of global clinical lung function measures are compared to resistance predictions in the models to assess their suitability for use in a patient-specific setting. We show a significant difference (p < 0.01) in airways resistance at all tested flow rates in complete airway trees built using CT data from severe asthmatics (GINA 3-5) versus healthy subjects. Further, model predictions of airways resistance at all flow rates are shown to correlate with patient forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (Spearman ρ = -0.65, p < 0.001) and, at low flow rates (0.00017 L/s), FEV1 over forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (ρ = -0.58, p < 0.001). We conclude that the pipeline and anatomical models can be used directly in mechanistic modelling studies and can form the basis for future patient-based modelling studies.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicAgedAirway ResistanceFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID26656288
PMCPMC4684353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.