Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656254›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2016

Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions.

Joris de Wit, Anirvan Ghosh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The intracellular domain of the epilepsy protein PCDH19 regulates spine density in cortical neurons in vivo viaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neuronal TDP-43 regulates myelin formation via neurexin 1 mRNA stabilization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joris de WitVIB Center for the Biology of Disease and Center for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Anirvan GhoshNeuroscience Discovery, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

REGULATION OF GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES BY LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEINR01NS067216 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GHOSH, ANIRVAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01NS067216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular diversification of cell surface molecules has long been postulated to impart specific surface identities on neuronal cell types. The existence of unique cell surface identities would allow neurons to distinguish one another and connect with their appropriate target cells. Although progress has been made in identifying cell type-specific surface molecule repertoires and in characterizing their extracellular interactions, determining how this molecular diversity contributes to the precise wiring of neural circuitry has proven challenging. Here, we review the role of the cadherin, neurexin, immunoglobulin and leucine-rich repeat protein superfamilies in the specification of connectivity. The emerging evidence suggests that the concerted actions of these proteins may critically contribute to the assembly of neural circuits.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell CommunicationCell MembraneHumansLeucine-Rich Repeat ProteinsNeuronsProteinsSynapsesLeucine-Rich Repeat ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26656254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.