Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656026›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Discordance between presumed standard of care and actual clinical practice: the example of rubber dam use during root canal treatment in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Gregg H Gilbert, Joseph L Riley, Paul D Eleazer, Paul L Benjamin, Ellen Funkhouser, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Online Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate the Attitudes and Use of Rubber Dental Dams by Saudi Dental Practitioners.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Impact of COVID-19 Related Lockdown on Dental Practice in Central Italy-Outcomes of A Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prescription Drug Abuse Among Patients in Rural Dental Practices Reported by Members of the National Dental PBRN.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregg H GilbertDepartment of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Joseph L RileyDepartment of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Paul D EleazerDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Paul L BenjaminPrivate practice of general dentistry, Miami, Florida, USA.
Ellen FunkhouserDivision of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE-22516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUse of a rubber dam during root canal treatment is considered the standard of care because it enhances patient safety and optimises the odds of successful treatment. Nonetheless, not all dentists use a rubber dam, creating disconnect between presumed standard of care and what is actually done in clinical practice. Little is known about dentists' attitudes towards use of the rubber dam in their practices. The objectives were to: (1) quantify these attitudes and (2) test the hypothesis that specific attitudes are significantly associated with rubber dam use.

settingNational Dental Practice-Based Research Network (NationalDentalPBRN.org).

participants1490 network dentists. OUTCOME MEASURES: Dentists completed a questionnaire about their attitudes towards rubber dam use during root canal treatment. Three attitude scales comprised 33 items that used a 5-point ordinal scale to measure beliefs about effectiveness, inconvenience, ease of placement, comparison to other isolation techniques and patient factors. Factor analysis, cluster analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysed the relationship between attitudes and rubber dam use.

resultsAll items had responses at each point on the 5-point scale, with an overall pattern of substantial variation across dentists. Five attitudinal factors (rubber dam effectiveness; inconvenient/time-consuming; ease of placement; effectiveness compared to Isolite; patient factors) and 4 clusters of practitioners were identified. Each factor and cluster was independently and strongly associated with rubber dam use.

conclusionsGeneral dentists have substantial variation in attitudes about rubber dam use. Beliefs that rubber dam use is not effective, inconvenient, time-consuming, not easy to place or affected by patient factors, were independently and significantly associated with lower rubber dam use. These attitudes explain why there is substantial discordance between presumed standard of care and actual practice.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelStandard of CareDentistsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisPractice Patterns, Dentists'Root Canal TherapyRubber DamsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID26656026
PMCPMC4679916
OpenAlexW2195608915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.