Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656019›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Cost-effectiveness of a European ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction network: results from the Catalan Codi Infart network.

Ander Regueiro, Julia Bosch, Victoria Martín-Yuste, Alba Rosas, Maria Teresa Faixedas, Joan Antoni Gómez-Hospital, Jaume Figueras, Antoni Curós, Angel Cequier, Javier Goicolea and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ander RegueiroServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Iniciativa Stent for Life, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-447X
Julia BoschCentro de Investigación en Economía y Salud, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Victoria Martín-YusteServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alba RosasDepartament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Maria Teresa FaixedasDepartament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Joan Antoni Gómez-HospitalServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume FiguerasServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni CurósServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Angel CequierServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier GoicoleaIniciativa Stent for Life, Spain.
Antonio Fernández-OrtizIniciativa Stent for Life, Spain.
Carlos MacayaIniciativa Stent for Life, Spain.
Ricard TresserrasDepartament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain.
Laura PelliséCentro de Investigación en Economía y Salud, Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Manel SabatéServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Iniciativa Stent for Life, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network of Catalonia (Codi Infart).

designCost-utility analysis.

settingThe analysis was from the Catalonian Autonomous Community in Spain, with a population of about 7.5 million people.

participantsPatients with STEMI treated within the autonomous community of Catalonia (Spain) included in the IAM CAT II-IV and Codi Infart registries. OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs included hospitalisation, procedures and additional personnel and were obtained according to the reperfusion strategy. Clinical outcomes were defined as 30-day avoided mortality and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), before (N=356) and after network implementation (N=2140).

resultsA substitution effect and a technology effect were observed; aggregate costs increased by 2.6%. The substitution effect resulted from increased use of primary coronary angioplasty, a relatively expensive procedure and a decrease in fibrinolysis. Primary coronary angioplasty increased from 31% to 89% with the network, and fibrinolysis decreased from 37% to 3%. Rescue coronary angioplasty declined from 11% to 4%, and no reperfusion from 21% to 4%. The technological effect was related to improvements in the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure that increased efficiency, reducing the average length of the hospital stay. Mean costs per patient decreased from €8306 to €7874 for patients with primary coronary angioplasty. Clinical outcomes in patients treated with primary coronary angioplasty did not change significantly, although 30-day mortality decreased from 7.5% to 5.6%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio resulted in an extra cost of €4355 per life saved (30-day mortality) and €495 per QALY. Below a cost threshold of €30,000, results were sensitive to variations in costs and outcomes.

conclusionsThe Catalan STEMI network (Codi Infart) is cost-efficient. Further studies are needed in geopolitical different scenarios.

Indexed as

AgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRegistriesSpainHEALTH ECONOMICS

Identifiers

PMID26656019
PMCPMC4679883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.