Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26656010›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2015

Use and safety of azithromycin in neonates: a systematic review.

Coral Smith, Oluwaseun Egunsola, Imti Choonara, Sailesh Kotecha, Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain, Helen Sammons

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03960970 (Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03960970 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Azithromycin-based Extended-spectrum Prophylaxis in Scheduled Cesarean Deliveries

TypeinterventionalSponsorRWJ Barnabas Health at Jersey City Medical CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled800ConditionsEndometritis, Cesarean Section, Infection, Wound InfectionArmsAzithromycin 500 mg, Mefoxin 2g
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. [Advances in clinical pharmacotherapy for neonatalZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Coral SmithAcademic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK.
Oluwaseun EgunsolaAcademic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK.
Imti ChoonaraAcademic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK.
Sailesh KotechaDepartment of Child Health, Institute of Molecular & Experimental Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Wales Heart Research Institute, Heath Park, UK.
Evelyne Jacqz-AigrainUniv Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Helen SammonsAcademic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBCardiff University · GBUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the use and adverse drug reactions associated with azithromycin in neonates.

settingDatabases MEDLINE (1948-August 2015), EMBASE (1980-August 2015) and Pubmed (August 2015) were searched for studies on azithromycin in neonates.

participantsAll studies involving neonates (<28 days old) who have received at least a single dose of azithromycin for which safety was evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was adverse event (AE) associated with use of azithromycin. Use of azithromycin in neonates was the secondary outcome.

resultsA total of 11 articles involving 473 neonates were identified. 371 AEs were reported. Adverse events were mainly respiratory (358/1000 neonate), neurological (273/1000 neonates) and gastrointestinal (196/1000 neonates) in origin. Azithromycin significantly reduced the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in extremely premature neonates (RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.98, p=0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of elevated liver enzymes between the azithromycin and placebo group (p=0.76). There were four cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS).

conclusionsAzithromycin significantly reduces the risk of BPD in preterm neonates. The relationship between azithromycin and IHPS requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinBronchopulmonary DysplasiaHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYNEONATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID26656010
PMCPMC4679913
OpenAlexW2190271138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.