Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26655740›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Detection of secondary binding sites in proteins using fragment screening.

R Frederick Ludlow, Marcel L Verdonk, Harpreet K Saini, Ian J Tickle, Harren Jhoti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Structural Chemistry of Helicase Inhibition.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Structural Biology for Target Identification and Validation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Secondary Sites of the C-type Lectin-Like Fold.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Frederick LudlowAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge CB4 0QA, United Kingdom.
Marcel L VerdonkAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge CB4 0QA, United Kingdom.
Harpreet K SainiAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge CB4 0QA, United Kingdom.
Ian J TickleAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge CB4 0QA, United Kingdom.
Harren JhotiAstex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge CB4 0QA, United Kingdom harren.jhoti@astx.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins need to be tightly regulated as they control biological processes in most normal cellular functions. The precise mechanisms of regulation are rarely completely understood but can involve binding of endogenous ligands and/or partner proteins at specific locations on a protein that can modulate function. Often, these additional secondary binding sites appear separate to the primary binding site, which, for example for an enzyme, may bind a substrate. In previous work, we have uncovered several examples in which secondary binding sites were discovered on proteins using fragment screening approaches. In each case, we were able to establish that the newly identified secondary binding site was biologically relevant as it was able to modulate function by the binding of a small molecule. In this study, we investigate how often secondary binding sites are located on proteins by analyzing 24 protein targets for which we have performed a fragment screen using X-ray crystallography. Our analysis shows that, surprisingly, the majority of proteins contain secondary binding sites based on their ability to bind fragments. Furthermore, sequence analysis of these previously unknown sites indicate high conservation, which suggests that they may have a biological function, perhaps via an allosteric mechanism. Comparing the physicochemical properties of the secondary sites with known primary ligand binding sites also shows broad similarities indicating that many of the secondary sites may be druggable in nature with small molecules that could provide new opportunities to modulate potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction Domains and MotifsAlgorithmsBinding SitesCrystallography, X-RayHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProteinsfragment-based drug designprotein functionprotein structureX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID26655740
PMCPMC4703025
OpenAlexW2190199357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.