Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26655141›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2016

Electronic enhancement of tear secretion.

Mark Brinton, Jae Lim Chung, Andrea Kossler, Koung Hoon Kook, Jim Loudin, Manfred Franke, Daniel Palanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrochemical skin conductance: a systematic review.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Stimulating Tear Production: Spotlight on Neurostimulation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Enhanced Tearing by Electrical Stimulation of the Anterior Ethmoid Nerve.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017
    Article
  13. Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark BrintonStanford University, Electrical Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jae Lim ChungKonyang University College of Medicine, Kim's Eye Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Andrea KosslerStanford University School of Medicine, Ophthalmology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Koung Hoon KookAjou University School of Medicine, Ophthalmology, Suwon, Korea.
Jim LoudinOculeve, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Manfred FrankeOculeve, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daniel PalankerStanford University School of Medicine, Ophthalmology, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USAjou University · KRKonyang University · KR

Funding

Electronic Stimulator of Lacrimal GlandR01EY023259 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2013 to 2015
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY023259NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study electrical stimulation of the lacrimal gland and afferent nerves for enhanced tear secretion, as a potential treatment for dry eye disease. We investigate the response pathways and electrical parameters to safely maximize tear secretion. APPROACH: We evaluated the tear response to electrical stimulation of the lacrimal gland and afferent nerves in isofluorane-anesthetized rabbits. In acute studies, electrical stimulation was performed using bipolar platinum foil electrodes, implanted beneath the inferior lacrimal gland, and a monopolar electrode placed near the afferent ethmoid nerve. Wireless microstimulators with bipolar electrodes were implanted beneath the lacrimal gland for chronic studies. To identify the response pathways, we applied various pharmacological inhibitors. To optimize the stimulus, we measured tear secretion rate (Schirmer test) as a function of pulse amplitude (1.5-12 mA), duration (0.1-1 ms) and repetition rate (10-100 Hz). MAIN

resultsStimulation of the lacrimal gland increased tear secretion by engaging efferent parasympathetic nerves. Tearing increased with stimulation amplitude, pulse duration and repetition rate, up to 70 Hz. Stimulation with 3 mA, 500 μs pulses at 70 Hz provided a 4.5 mm (125%) increase in Schirmer score. Modulating duty cycle further increased tearing up to 57%, compared to continuous stimulation in chronically implanted animals (36%). Ethmoid (afferent) nerve stimulation increased tearing similar to gland stimulation (3.6 mm) via a reflex pathway. In animals with chronically implanted stimulators, a nearly 6 mm increase (57%) was achieved with 12-fold less charge density per pulse (0.06-0.3 μC mm(-2) with 170-680 μs pulses) than the damage threshold (3.5 μC mm(-2) with 1 ms pulses). SIGNIFICANCE: Electrical stimulation of the lacrimal gland or afferent nerves may be used as a treatment for dry eye disease. Clinical trials should validate this approach in patients with aqueous tear deficiency, and further optimize electrical parameters for maximum clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsDry Eye SyndromesElectric Stimulation TherapyEye InjuriesLacrimal ApparatusPeripheral NervesRabbitsTearsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26655141
PMCPMC6492550
OpenAlexW2190728565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.