Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26655078›Full record

ArticleCellular reprogramming2015

Factors Determining the Efficiency of Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Data Analysis with Over 200,000 Reconstructed Embryos.

Tianbin Liu, Hongwei Dou, Xi Xiang, Lin Li, Yong Li, Lin Lin, Xinzhi Pang, Yijie Zhang, Yu Chen, Jing Luan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular reprogramming, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Current Techniques of Gene Editing in Pigs for Xenotransplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effects of anVeterinary medicine international · 2023
    Article
  6. One-Step In Vitro Generation of ETV2-Null Pig Embryos.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Tianbin Liu1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Hongwei Dou1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Xi Xiang1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Lin Li1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Yong Li2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Lin Lin1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Xinzhi Pang2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Yijie Zhang1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Yu Chen2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Jing Luan2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Ying Xu2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Zhenzhen Yang2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Wenxian Yang2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Huan Liu2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Feida Li2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Hui Wang2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Huanming Yang2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Lars Bolund2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Gabor Vajta2 BGI-Shenzhen , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .
Yutao Du1 BGI Ark Biotechnology Co., LTD (BAB) , Shenzhen, Guangdong, China .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data analysis in somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) research is usually limited to several hundreds or thousands of reconstructed embryos. Here, we report mass results obtained with an established and consistent porcine SCNT system (handmade cloning [HMC]). During the experimental period, 228,230 reconstructed embryos and 82,969 blastocysts were produced. After being transferred into 656 recipients, 1070 piglets were obtained. First, the effects of different types of donor cells, including fetal fibroblasts (FFs), adult fibroblasts (AFs), adult preadipocytes (APs), and adult blood mesenchymal (BM) cells, were investigated on the further in vitro and in vivo development. Compared to adult donor cells (AFs, APs, BM cells, respectively), FF cells resulted in a lower blastocyst/reconstructed embryo rate (30.38% vs. 37.94%, 34.65%, and 34.87%, respectively), but a higher overall efficiency on the number of piglets born alive per total blastocysts transferred (1.50% vs. 0.86%, 1.03%, and 0.91%, respectively) and a lower rate of developmental abnormalities (10.87% vs. 56.57%, 24.39%, and 51.85%, respectively). Second, recloning was performed with cloned adult fibroblasts (CAFs) and cloned fetal fibroblasts (CFFs). When CAFs were used as the nuclear donor, fewer developmental abnormalities and higher overall efficiency were observed compared to AFs (56.57% vs. 28.13% and 0.86% vs. 1.59%, respectively). However, CFFs had an opposite effect on these parameters when compared with CAFs (94.12% vs. 10.87% and 0.31% vs. 1.50%, respectively). Third, effects of genetic modification on the efficiency of SCNT were investigated with transgenic fetal fibroblasts (TFFs) and gene knockout fetal fibroblasts (KOFFs). Genetic modification of FFs increased developmental abnormalities (38.96% and 25.24% vs. 10.87% for KOFFs, TFFs, and FFs, respectively). KOFFs resulted in lower overall efficiency compared to TFFs and FFs (0.68% vs. 1.62% and 1.50%, respectively). In conclusion, this is the first report of large-scale analysis of porcine cell nuclear transfer that provides important data for potential industrialization of HMC technology.

Indexed as

Nuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBlastocystCell LineCloning, OrganismEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferFibroblastsOocytesSwine

Identifiers

PMID26655078
PMCPMC4677548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.