Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26654230›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Construction of relatedness matrices using genotyping-by-sequencing data.

Ken G Dodds, John C McEwan, Rudiger Brauning, Rayna M Anderson, Tracey C van Stijn, Theodor Kristjánsson, Shannon M Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PotatoMASH is a cost-effective marker system for genomic prediction in potato based on short-read haplotypes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  7. Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Parentage assignment in black soldier fly (Frontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Coat colour in marsupials: genetic variants at theRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Construction of relatedness matrices in autopolyploid populations using low-depth high-throughput sequencing data.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ken G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. ken.dodds@agresearch.co.nz.
John C McEwanAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. john.mcewan@agresearch.co.nz.
Rudiger BrauningAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. rudiger.brauning@agresearch.co.nz.
Rayna M AndersonAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. rayna.anderson@agresearch.co.nz.
Tracey C van StijnAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. tracey.vanstijn@agresearch.co.nz.
Theodor KristjánssonStofnfiskur, Staðarberg 2-4, Hafnarfjörður, IS-221, Iceland. theodor@stofnfiskur.is.
Shannon M ClarkeAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand. shannon.clarke@agresearch.co.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is becoming an attractive alternative to array-based methods for genotyping individuals for a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Costs can be lowered by reducing the mean sequencing depth, but this results in genotype calls of lower quality. A common analysis strategy is to filter SNPs to just those with sufficient depth, thereby greatly reducing the number of SNPs available. We investigate methods for estimating relatedness using GBS data, including results of low depth, using theoretical calculation, simulation and application to a real data set.

resultsWe show that unbiased estimates of relatedness can be obtained by using only those SNPs with genotype calls in both individuals. The expected value of this estimator is independent of the SNP depth in each individual, under a model of genotype calling that includes the special case of the two alleles being read at random. In contrast, the estimator of self-relatedness does depend on the SNP depth, and we provide a modification to provide unbiased estimates of self-relatedness. We refer to these methods of estimation as kinship using GBS with depth adjustment (KGD). The estimators can be calculated using matrix methods, which allow efficient computation. Simulation results were consistent with the methods being unbiased, and suggest that the optimal sequencing depth is around 2-4 for relatedness between individuals and 5-10 for self-relatedness. Application to a real data set revealed that some SNP filtering may still be necessary, for the exclusion of SNPs which did not behave in a Mendelian fashion. A simple graphical method (a 'fin plot') is given to illustrate this issue and to guide filtering parameters.

conclusionWe provide a method which gives unbiased estimates of relatedness, based on SNPs assayed by GBS, which accounts for the depth (including zero depth) of the genotype calls. This allows GBS to be applied at read depths which can be chosen to optimise the information obtained. SNPs with excess heterozygosity, often due to (partial) polyploidy or other duplications can be filtered based on a simple graphical method.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26654230
PMCPMC4675043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.