Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26654211›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2016

Quantifying and qualifying the preventive effects of acute-phase cognitive therapy: Pathways to personalizing care.

Robin B Jarrett, Abu Minhajuddin, Jeffrey R Vittengl, Lee Anna Clark, Michael E Thase

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Can we help more?World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin B JarrettDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Abu MinhajuddinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Jeffrey R VittenglDepartment of Psychology, Truman State University.
Lee Anna ClarkDepartment of Psychology, Notre Dame University.
Michael E ThaseDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USTruman State University · USUniversity of Notre Dame · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

PROPHYLACTIC COGNITIVE THERAPY FOR DEPRESSIONR01MH058397 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JARRETT, ROBIN B · 2000 to 2011
$4.1M
PROPHYLACTIC COGNITIVE THERAPY FOR DEPRESSIONR01MH058356 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI THASE, MICHAEL E · 2000 to 2010
$3.5M
Are Cognitive Therapy's Antidepressant Effects Durable?R01MH069619 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JARRETT, ROBIN B · 2004 to 2009
$1.7M
Are Cognitive Therapy's Antidepressant Effects Durable?R01MH069618 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FRIEDMAN, EDWARD S. · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
Cognitive Therapy for High Risk &Refractory DepressionK24MH001571 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JARRETT, ROBIN B · 2005 to 2009
$625k
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH001571NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058356NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH058397NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069618NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the extent to which prospectively identified responders to cognitive therapy (CT) for recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) hypothesized to be lower risk show significantly less relapse or recurrence than treated higher risk counterparts across 32 months.

methodOutpatients (N = 523), aged 18-70, with recurrent MDD received 12-14 weeks of CT. The last 7 consecutive scores from the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) were used to stratify or define responders (n = 290) into lower (7 HRSD-17 scores of less than or equal to 6; n = 49; 17%) and higher risk (n = 241; 83%). The lower risk patients entered the 32-month follow-up. Higher risk patients were randomized to 8 months of continuation-phase CT or clinical management plus double-blind fluoxetine or pill placebo, with a 24-month follow-up.

resultsLower risk patients were significantly less likely to relapse over the first 8 months compared to higher risk patients (Kaplan-Meier [KM] estimates; i.e., 4.9% = lower risk; 22.1% = higher risk; log-rank χ2 = 6.83, p = .009). This increased risk was attenuated, but not completely neutralized, by active continuation-phase therapy. Over the subsequent 24 months, the lower and higher risk groups did not differ in relapse or recurrence risk.

conclusionsRapid and sustained acute-phase CT remission identifies responders who do not require continuation-phase treatment to prevent relapse (i.e., return of an index episode). To prevent recurrence (i.e., new episodes), however, strategic allocation and more frequent "dosing" of CT and/or targeted maintenance-phase treatments may be required. Longitudinal follow-up is recommended.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluoxetineFollow-Up StudiesHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPrecision MedicineRecurrenceAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationFluoxetine

Identifiers

PMID26654211
PMCPMC4807431
OpenAlexW2334804558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.